Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jan;24(4):160-3.

Clinical audit of the process of referral to genitourinary medicine of patients found to be chlamydia positive in a family planning service

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10023102

Clinical audit of the process of referral to genitourinary medicine of patients found to be chlamydia positive in a family planning service

J M Tobin et al. Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jan.

Abstract

This paper describes a collaborative audit between a large family planning and genitourinary medicine (GUM) service undertaken to ensure that all women presenting for termination of pregnancy (TOP) or IUD fitting were offered screening for chlamydia, were informed of a positive result, and were subsequently referred to GUM for full sexual health screening and contact tracing. Over a six month period in 1996 1072 patients were seen for either TOP (763) or W1) fitting (309) and of these 999 were offered a test which was performed in 988. Overall 38 positive tests were reported (3.8 per cent) but only two of 259 patients tested prior to lUD fitting were found to have chlamydia (<0.8 per cent). Only 27 of these 38 women (74 per cent) had information recorded in their notes that they had been given their result and 24 patients (63 per cent) were seen in GUM. The audit uncovered problems with documentation and cross-referencing of information which largely accounted for the failure to reach some of the standards set. An action plan has been formulated in an attempt to improve this aspect of the screening service. If more widespread screening for chlamydia is to be effectively implemented as recommended by the 31st RCOG Study Group on the Prevention of Pelvic Infection, then it is of importance that workable local protocols are in place including arrangements for partner notification and treatment. This will involve close collaboration between a range of specialities working in the sexual health field.

PIP: A full chlamydia screening program was implemented in Portsmouth, UK, in 1993 for all women attending the family planning service for induced abortion, IUD insertion, or with suspicious clinical symptoms. An audit was conducted over a 6-month period in 1996 to ensure that family planning clients were being offered screening for chlamydia, informed of a positive test result, and, if positive, referred to the genitourinary medicine department for a full sexual health screening and contact tracing. 999 patients (93.2%) who attended the clinic during the study period for induced abortion or IUD fitting were offered chlamydia testing. 38 of these women (3.8%) were chlamydia-positive. Referrals were made to the genitourinary medicine department for 28 of these women (74%). Overall, 24 women (63%) with a positive chlamydia test presented to the genitourinary medicine clinic, a mean time of 10 working days after testing. 15 of these women identified contacts. The audit revealed major deficiencies in accurate, reliable documentation. An action plan has been formulated to improve this aspect of the screening service.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources