Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs
- PMID: 10029393
- DOI: 10.1080/110241598750005156
Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs
Abstract
Objective: To assess the extent of shrinkage of meshes used for hernia repair.
Design: Experimental study in dogs.
Setting: University hospital, Germany and University Research Centre, Moscow.
Animals: 10 dogs had monofilament polypropylene meshes that weighed 95 g/m2 (Marlex) or multifilament reduced polypropylene meshes combined with polyglactin 910 that weighed 55 g/m2 (Soft Hernia Mesh) implanted for either 3 or 6 months.
Main outcome measures: Histological appearance and radiological assessment of the position and area of the mesh.
Results: After 4 weeks the area of mesh in the monofilament group was reduced from to 139 (11) to 75 (8) cm2 (54%) and that of the multifilament from 116 (18) to 77 (20) cm2 (66%). The multifilament mesh with the reduced amount of polypropylene showed less inflammatory response and less shrinkage. The mesh did not seem to have moved.
Conclusion: Meshes that contain a lot of polypropylene shrink to about 30%-50% of their original size after 4 weeks, requiring an overlap of at least 3 cm if implanted subfascially. Reduction in the polypropylene content decreases both the inflammatory response and the shrinkage. Meshes with big pores are less likely to fold and improve compatibility.
Similar articles
-
Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model.J Surg Res. 2006 Nov;136(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.05.022. Epub 2006 Sep 22. J Surg Res. 2006. PMID: 16996087
-
[Titanised polypropylene meshes: first clinical experience with the implantation in TAPP technique and the results of a survey in 22 German surgical departments].Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Oct;129(5):363-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820400. Zentralbl Chir. 2004. PMID: 15486786 German.
-
Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia.Eur J Med Res. 2005 Jun 22;10(6):247-53. Eur J Med Res. 2005. PMID: 16033714 Clinical Trial.
-
[The problem of mesh shrinkage in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair].Zentralbl Chir. 2009 Jun;134(3):209-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098779. Epub 2009 Jun 17. Zentralbl Chir. 2009. PMID: 19536713 Review. German.
-
[Retromuscular mesh repair for ventral incision hernia in Germany].Chirurg. 2002 Sep;73(9):888-94. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0535-0. Chirurg. 2002. PMID: 12297953 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Brief Review of PVDF Properties and Applications Potential.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Nov 8;14(22):4793. doi: 10.3390/polym14224793. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36432920 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1225-34. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6. Epub 2012 Oct 3. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012. PMID: 23053458 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Does the additional application of a polylactide film (SurgiWrap) to a lightweight mesh (TiMesh) reduce adhesions after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation procedures? Experimental results obtained with the laparoscopic porcine model.Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2433-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9876-1. Epub 2008 Apr 24. Surg Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18437484
-
Shrinkage and biomechanical evaluation of lightweight synthetics in a rabbit model for primary fascial repair.Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Sep;22(9):1099-108. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1440-1. Epub 2011 May 12. Int Urogynecol J. 2011. PMID: 21562913
-
Polypropylene, polyester or polytetrafluoroethylene-is there an ideal material for mesh augmentation at the esophageal hiatus? Results from an experimental study in a porcine model.Hernia. 2014;18(6):873-81. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1305-x. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Hernia. 2014. PMID: 25159558