Chemosensory event-related potentials to trigeminal stimuli change in relation to the interval between repetitive stimulation of the nasal mucosa
- PMID: 10065380
- DOI: 10.1007/s004050050115
Chemosensory event-related potentials to trigeminal stimuli change in relation to the interval between repetitive stimulation of the nasal mucosa
Abstract
Event-related potentials (ERPs) to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli have been used commonly to evaluate chemosensory dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to investigate how ERPs could be modified by repetitive stimulations of the intranasal trigeminal nerve using 52% v/v CO2 stimuli for 200 ms periods. Nine subjects were exposed to 6 sessions each during which trains of 16 stimuli were applied. The interval between stimuli was constant for each experiment, but varied between experiments (10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 90 s). Trigeminal ERPs were obtained from three positions on the skull. Both intensity ratings and ERP amplitudes decreased as the interstimulus interval (ISI) shortened. Specifically, ratings and response amplitudes were most strongly reduced by approximately 30-50% at the shortest ISI used (10 s) and were largest at an ISI of 90 s. The decrease of amplitudes was strongest for the P46 amplitude. Our findings suggest that this may be the result of both habituation and stimulus predictability. We hypothesize that the ISI dependence of chemosensory ERPs may also be a function of an interaction between Adelta and C fibers.
Similar articles
-
Time-course of trigeminal versus olfactory stimulation: evidence from chemosensory evoked potentials.Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Mar;95(3):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Feb 16. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25697131
-
Responses of rat medullary dorsal horn neurons following intranasal noxious chemical stimulation: effects of stimulus intensity, duration, and interstimulus interval.J Neurophysiol. 1993 Dec;70(6):2260-75. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2260. J Neurophysiol. 1993. PMID: 8120581
-
Responses to olfactory and intranasal trigeminal stimuli: relation to the respiratory cycle.Neuroscience. 2011 Feb 23;175:178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.11.038. Epub 2010 Dec 9. Neuroscience. 2011. PMID: 21145944
-
Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials.Neurophysiol Clin. 2006 Mar-Apr;36(2):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2006.03.005. Epub 2006 Apr 19. Neurophysiol Clin. 2006. PMID: 16844543 Review.
-
Assessment of intranasal trigeminal function.Int J Psychophysiol. 2000 May;36(2):147-55. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(99)00108-7. Int J Psychophysiol. 2000. PMID: 10742569 Review.
Cited by
-
Are there sex-related differences in responses to repetitive olfactory/trigeminal stimuli?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Aug;266(8):1323-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0860-0. Epub 2008 Nov 11. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009. PMID: 19002476
-
Some like it, some do not: behavioral responses and central processing of olfactory-trigeminal mixture perception.Brain Struct Funct. 2021 Jan;226(1):247-261. doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02178-4. Epub 2020 Dec 23. Brain Struct Funct. 2021. PMID: 33355693 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced Odorant Localization Abilities in Congenitally Blind but not in Late-Blind Individuals.Chem Senses. 2021 Jan 1;46:bjaa073. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa073. Chem Senses. 2021. PMID: 33140091 Free PMC article.
-
Central encoding of the strength of intranasal chemosensory trigeminal stimuli in a human experimental pain setting.Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec 15;41(18):5240-5254. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25190. Epub 2020 Sep 1. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020. PMID: 32870583 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Fancy Citrus, Feel Good: Positive Judgment of Citrus Odor, but Not the Odor Itself, Is Associated with Elevated Mood during Experienced Helplessness.Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 2;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00074. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26869973 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources