Surgically-assisted orthopedic protraction of the maxilla in cleft lip and palate patients
- PMID: 10065641
Surgically-assisted orthopedic protraction of the maxilla in cleft lip and palate patients
Abstract
Fourteen children, aged 8 to 13 years, with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate, were treated by an incomplete Le Fort I osteotomy without down-fracturing the maxilla, followed by traction of the maxilla by face mask for twelve weeks. Our results revealed a mean maxillary forward movement of 7.2 mm after three weeks of traction, followed by a retention period of nine weeks for callus maturation. There was an associated minor downward movement of the maxilla that caused a slight increase in the lower facial height, which improved the facial esthetics of the patients. The advantages of this method are: i) it allows for early skeletal advancement of the maxilla with new bone formation in the osteotomy line, ii) there is no need for inter-maxillary fixation of young patients and no need for rigid fixation of the maxilla by miniplates that can damage teeth buds and roots at this age, and iii) it can be used in young patients to improve esthetic appearance, an important factor in the psychological development of adolescents.
Similar articles
-
Long-term results in maxillary deficiency using intraoral devices.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jul;34(5):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.01.004. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005. PMID: 16053864
-
Vector alignment in maxillary distraction osteogenesis.J Craniofac Surg. 2006 Sep;17(5):992-7. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000234980.76992.69. J Craniofac Surg. 2006. PMID: 17003631
-
Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing patients.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Sep;66(9):1833-46. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.10.013. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18718390
-
Distraction osteogenesis of the cleft maxilla.Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Nov;24(4):467-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102910. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Facial Plast Surg. 2008. PMID: 19034823 Review.
-
The use of a face mask for postoperative retention in cleft lip and palate patients.Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2000 Summer;15(2):114-8. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2000. PMID: 11307421 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask.Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):1002-9. doi: 10.2319/120913-905.1. Epub 2014 Mar 21. Angle Orthod. 2014. PMID: 24654941 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Maxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Literature Review.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019 Dec;18(4):500-508. doi: 10.1007/s12663-019-01217-w. Epub 2019 Mar 30. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019. PMID: 31624427 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rapid maxillary expansion compared to surgery for assistance in maxillary face mask protraction.Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):42-49. doi: 10.2319/042210-220.1. Angle Orthod. 2011. PMID: 20936953 Free PMC article.
-
Corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics.Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):48-57. doi: 10.2319/121513-921.1. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 24913740 Free PMC article.
-
Re: New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage. Angle Orthod.2010;80:595–603. By Baek SH, Kim KW, Choi JY.Angle Orthod. 2012 Jan;82(1):180; author reply 180-1. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219-82.1.180. Angle Orthod. 2012. PMID: 22220846 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical