Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer
- PMID: 10066088
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1006193704132
Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer
Abstract
Many studies are carried out in an effort to find factors that help explain the large unexplained variation in prognosis of breast cancer patients. The principles of good study design and analysis are less well appreciated for prognostic factor studies than for therapeutic trials. The oncology literature is full of results from studies of varying quality, often with conflicting findings. As a consequence, despite the large number of studies, there is still uncertainty about the importance of most prognostic factors. Few recently proposed prognostic factors for breast cancer have become widely accepted. This paper reviews the important methodological issues underlying such research. These issues are illustrated with examples from published studies and recent reviews of papers published in cancer journals. Guidelines are proposed for conducting and evaluating prognostic factor studies which should improve the quality of research in this important area.
Similar articles
-
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184. Dan Med Bull. 2010. PMID: 20816024
-
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 5;95(11):e771-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00597. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013. PMID: 23780547
-
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15. Oncologist. 2015. PMID: 25876994 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic factor studies in oncology: osteosarcoma as a clinical example.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Feb 1;49(2):513-8. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01507-8. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001. PMID: 11173148 Review.
-
Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer: a review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years.Ann Surg. 2002 Jan;235(1):10-26. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00003. Ann Surg. 2002. PMID: 11753038 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Previous Knee Surgery, Anteromedial Portal Drilling, Quadriceps Tendon Autograft, and Meniscal Involvement Associated With Delayed Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Amateur Athletes.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 18;6(3):100911. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100911. eCollection 2024 Jun. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 39006786 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.BMC Med. 2012 May 29;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-51. BMC Med. 2012. PMID: 22642691 Free PMC article.
-
Missing covariate data within cancer prognostic studies: a review of current reporting and proposed guidelines.Br J Cancer. 2004 Jul 5;91(1):4-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601907. Br J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15188004 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain.J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Sep;15(3):285-94. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-5937-7. J Occup Rehabil. 2005. PMID: 16119221
-
Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables.BMJ. 2001 Jul 28;323(7306):224-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11473921 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials