Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998;21(4):217-25.
doi: 10.1007/BF01105775.

Operative treatment of spondylodiscitis--what is the most effective approach?

Affiliations

Operative treatment of spondylodiscitis--what is the most effective approach?

C Hopf et al. Neurosurg Rev. 1998.

Abstract

In a study the results recorded in 34 surgically treated patients with specific or unspecific spondylodiscitis after dorsoventral one-stage instrumentation with CDI and anterior grafting (group 1) were compared with those obtained in a group of 38 patients treated with anterior CDH instrumentation in combination with anterior grafting (group 2). The mean observation periods were 48.4 (19-82) months in group 1 and 29.0 (8-54) months in group 2. In both groups the infection healed after fusion without a secondary operation. In group 1 the mean values for blood loss, operating time, length of hospital stay and fusion length (3.5 segments) were significant higher than those in group 2; in particular, the fusion length was shorter (1.3 segments) in group 2. Only 8 patients in group 1 were treated with postoperative external support. The mean preoperative segmental angle of 18.2 degrees (group 1) was corrected by a mean of 11.9 degrees, and the reposition loss during follow-up amounted to an average of 2.7 degrees. Group 2 showed a mean preoperative segmental deformity angle of 13.4 degrees, which was corrected by 11.6 degrees, and the loss of reposition was 2.9 degrees on average. Even in florid spondylodiscitis a short-range anterior fusion of the affected spinal segment can be performed with a primary stable implant, avoiding a second operation without an increased risk of infection-related dislocation. In the authors' own experience a secondary dorsal operation can be avoided except in the case segment L-5/S-1, the fast mobilization without external support allows a up-to-date treatment in this severe spinal disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1981;35:299-324 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Oct;(189):116-24 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1964 Nov-Dec;37:130-44 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973 Oct;(96):248-53 - PubMed
    1. Tubercle. 1962 Dec;43:406-11 - PubMed

MeSH terms