Complications of brain tissue pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device
- PMID: 10068186
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01105781
Complications of brain tissue pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device
Abstract
Seventy-five patients with intracranial hypertension whose Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) was 8 or below and in whom intracranial pressure (ICP) was monitored were examined for complications of this procedure. In 20 of the 75 patients we used only an intraparenchymal fiberoptic ICP monitoring transducer, while, in the remaining 55 patients, who required CSF drainage, a ventricular drainage set (VDS) was used in addition to ICP monitoring. The duration of monitoring with the ICP transducer alone was approximately 5.1+/-2.6 das (min. 1, max. 13) and that of ICP monitoring with VDS was 6.2+/-3.1 days (min. 1, max. 13). In 8 cases a total of 9 complications were experienced (12%). These complications were infection in 3 cases (4%), epidural hematoma in 2 cases (2.7%), disconnection in 2 cases (2.7%) and contusion in 2 cases (2.7%). Although none of the 44 patients who were monitored for less than 5 days experienced infection, 3 of the 31 patients monitored for longer than 5 days did experience infection (9.7%) (p<0.05). None of the 20 patients who underwent ICP monitoring only experienced infection. However, 3 of the 55 patients in whom the ventricular drainage set was implanted in addition to the transducer for ICP monitoring experienced infection (p<0.05). Owing to its minimally invasive nature, low complication rate, and accuracy in monitoring the parenchyma pressure, the Camino fiberoptic intraparenchymal monitor has become the system of choice in our clinic.
Similar articles
-
Risk factors and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device.J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Feb;16(2):236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Dec 13. J Clin Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19071023
-
The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in a 1000 cases.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006 Apr;148(4):435-41. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0683-3. Epub 2005 Dec 27. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006. PMID: 16374566
-
The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice: reliability, handling characteristics and complications.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(11):1113-9; discussion 1119-20. doi: 10.1007/s007010050224. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998. PMID: 9870055
-
[Value of serial CT scanning and intracranial pressure monitoring for detecting new intracranial mass effect in severe head injury patients showing lesions type I-II in the initial CT scan].Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005 Jun;16(3):217-34. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005. PMID: 16007322 Review. Spanish.
-
Bedside burr hole for intracranial pressure monitoring performed by intensive care physicians. A 5-year experience.Intensive Care Med. 1996 Oct;22(10):1070-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01699230. Intensive Care Med. 1996. PMID: 8923072 Review.
Cited by
-
Neuromonitoring in the intensive care unit. I. Intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow monitoring.Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1263-1271. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0678-z. Epub 2007 May 24. Intensive Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17522844 Review.
-
Management of increased intracranial pressure.Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014 Feb;16(2):272. doi: 10.1007/s11940-013-0272-3. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014. PMID: 24390802