Comparative study of microbiological and histopathological techniques used for the detection of Helicobacter pylori

Abstract

This study evaluates the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of several techniques commonly used for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in an analysis of 105 biopsy specimens (gastric and duodenal). For comparative purposes, the techniques investigated were divided into 2 groups: histopathological and microbiological. The former included hematoxylin-eosin and Giemsa stains, a Gram stain modified for use in tissue, and immunohistochemical techniques. Microbiological analysis was performed using culture, the urease test and the conventional Gram stain. The immunohistochemical techniques proved to be the most sensitive (93%). The modified Gram stain was sufficiently sensitive (92%) and specific (97%) for the detection of the bacterium. When combined with a microbiological technique such as the urease test, this stain showed increased sensitivity (96%) but its specificity was reduced to 94%. This combination of tests is recommended for the detection of H. pylori in biopsy specimens since it is easily performed at low cost and gives excellent results. For economical reasons, it is suggested that the use of immunohistochemical techniques should be restricted to specific cases.