[Phototherapy in severe atopic dermatitis. Comparison between current UVA1 therapy, UVA1 cold light and combined UVA-UVB therapy]

Abstract

Severe atopic dermatitis, especially when involving the face, does not respond well to conventional therapy. In the present prospective randomized trial, we compared therapeutic efficiency of medium-dose UVA1, medium-dose cold light UVA1 (15 treatment courses with 50 J/cm2 each) and combined UVA-UVB phototherapy. Four (13.3%) of 30 UVA1 treated patients, one (3.4%) of 30 UVA1 cold light treated patients and three (30%) of 10 patients treated with combined UVA-UVB discontinued therapy course before finishing treatment protocol because skin status did not improve or even deteriorated. In the other patients treated over a period of three weeks, skin status improved significantly or even cleared completely in 80.8% of UVA1 treated and in 89.7% of UVA1 cold light treated patients resulting in a significant decrease of the SCORAD-Score (UVA1 group from 68.6 +/- SD 10.9 to 29.8 +/- SD 7.1 and UVA1 cold light group from 72.5 +/- SD 13.4 to 23.8 +/- SD 11.6; p < 0.05 each). In the UVA-UVB treated group, the SCORAD-Score also decreased (from 71.0 +/- SD 9.4 to 41.6 +/- 10.5), but significantly less than in both UVA1 treated groups (p < 0.05 each). Four weeks after completing therapy UVA1 treated patients showed a prolonged therapy benefit as compared to UVA-UVB treated patients. Plasma levels of eosinophil cationic protein and soluble interleukin-2 receptor significantly decreased under UVA1 phototherapy but not under UVA-UVB therapy. Compared to conventional UVA1 phototherapy, UVA1 cold light phototherapy showed advantages due to the absence of potentially proinflammatory effects based on temperature-induced increase of skin blood flow (quantified by Laser doppler scanning) and increased sweat production (determined by the patient using a visual analog scale).