Slippery slopes in flat countries--a response
- PMID: 10070634
- PMCID: PMC479163
- DOI: 10.1136/jme.25.1.22
Slippery slopes in flat countries--a response
Abstract
In response to the paper by Keown and Jochemsen in which the latest empirical data concerning euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands is discussed, this paper discusses three points. The use of euthanasia in cases in which palliative care was a viable alternative may be taken as proof of a slippery slope. However, it could also be interpreted as an indication of a shift towards more autonomy-based end-of-life decisions. The cases of non-voluntary euthanasia are a serious problem in the Netherlands and they are only rarely justifiable. However, they do not prove the existence of a slippery slope. Persuading the physician to bring euthanasia cases to the knowledge of the authorities is a problem of any euthanasia policy. The Dutch notification procedure has recently been changed to reduce the underreporting of cases. However, many questions remain.
Comment in
-
Euthanasia in The Netherlands--down the slippery slope?J Med Ethics. 1999 Feb;25(1):3-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.1.3. J Med Ethics. 1999. PMID: 10070630 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Voluntary euthanasia in The Netherlands.J Med Ethics. 1999 Aug;25(4):351-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.4.351. J Med Ethics. 1999. PMID: 10461601 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Voluntary euthanasia under control? Further empirical evidence from The Netherlands.J Med Ethics. 1999 Feb;25(1):16-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.1.16. J Med Ethics. 1999. PMID: 10070633 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical