Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Feb;77(1):79-82.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770118.x.

Digital fundus imaging: a quality and cost comparison with 35-mm film

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Digital fundus imaging: a quality and cost comparison with 35-mm film

S Prasad et al. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares 35-mm transparencies with colour digital fundus images.

Methods: Colour fundus photos were acquired simultaneously on a digital system and on 35-mm film on 32 consecutive patients. These were assessed independently by two ophthalmologists who graded overall picture quality and granularity of the images. They also assessed if the images were adequate for the purpose of making a diagnosis. An analysis of the costs of the two systems was performed.

Results: The film images had significantly better scores for overall picture quality (p=0.0001, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.5) and granularity (p<0.0001, 95% CI 1.5 to 2). However, both digital and film images were considered adequate for diagnosis (p=0.052, 95% CI 0.12 to 8.32).

Conclusion: The quality of digital images is acceptable for diagnostic purposes although resolution is limited. Other advantages and developing technologies will make it increasingly attractive in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources