Conscious and unconscious processes: the effects of motivation
- PMID: 10072695
- DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1998.0378
Conscious and unconscious processes: the effects of motivation
Abstract
The process-dissociation procedure has been used in a variety of experimental contexts to assess the contributions of conscious and unconscious processes to task performance. To evaluate whether motivation affects estimates of conscious and unconscious processes, participants were given incentives to follow inclusion and exclusion instructions in a perception task and a memory task. Relative to a control condition in which no performance incentives were given, the results for the perception task indicated that incentives increased the participants' ability to exclude previously presented information, which in turn both increased the estimate of conscious processes and decreased the estimate of unconscious processes. However, the results also indicated that incentives did not influence estimates of conscious or unconscious processes in the memory task. The findings suggest that the process-dissociation procedure is relatively immune to influences of motivation when used with a memory task, but that caution should be exercised when the process-dissociation is used with a perception task.
Copyright 1999 Academic Press.
Similar articles
-
Unconscious auditory information can prime visual word processing: a process-dissociation procedure study.Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):688-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Dec 20. Conscious Cogn. 2008. PMID: 18086535
-
Conscious and unconscious influences of memory: temporal dynamics.Memory. 2000 Sep;8(5):333-43. doi: 10.1080/09658210050117753. Memory. 2000. PMID: 11045241
-
Disambiguating conscious and unconscious influences: do exclusion paradigms demonstrate unconscious perception?Am J Psychol. 2002 Winter;115(4):545-79. Am J Psychol. 2002. PMID: 12516528
-
Turning the process-dissociation procedure inside-out: a new technique for understanding the relation between conscious and unconscious influences.Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):270-80. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Oct 17. Conscious Cogn. 2010. PMID: 19837612 Review.
-
Habit and nonhabit systems for unconscious and conscious behavior: implications for multitasking.J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Feb;25(2):273-83. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00319. Epub 2012 Nov 19. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23163411 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of loss aversion on post-decision wagering: implications for measures of awareness.Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):352-63. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 11. Conscious Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20005133 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of alcohol and performance incentives on immediate working memory.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Aug;181(1):188-96. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2226-2. Epub 2005 Oct 15. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005. PMID: 15778883 Clinical Trial.
-
Evidence of weak conscious experiences in the exclusion task.Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 23;5:1080. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01080. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25295024 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources