Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy
- PMID: 10073757
- DOI: 10.1016/s0967-2109(98)00097-0
Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy
Abstract
Microemboli, as detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring, have been shown to be a potential cause of strokes after carotid endarterectomy. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients who underwent transcranial Doppler monitoring during 112 procedures for the treatment of 115 carotid bifurcation stenoses: 40 by percutaneous angioplasty with stenting and 75 by carotid endarterectomy. In PTAS procedures (n = 40), there was a mean of 74.0 emboli per stenosis (range 0-398, P = 0.0001) with 4 neurologic events per patient (P = 0.08). In CEA procedures (n = 76), there was a mean of 8.8. emboli per stenosis (range 0-102, P= 0.0001) with 1 neurologic event per patient (P = 0.08). The post-procedural neurological events in the percutaneous angioplasty with stenting population included two strokes (5.6%) and two transient ischemia attacks (5.6%). Microemboli for each of these cases totalled 133, 17, 29 and 47 (with one shower), respectively. One postoperative carotid endarterectomy patient was noted to have a stroke (1.4%), with 48 microemboli noted during that procedure. The mean emboli rate for percutaneous angioplasty with stenting patients with neurological events was 59.0: without complications it was 85.1. The mean emboli rate for carotid endarterectomy patients without complications was 8.3. Three percutaneous angioplasty with stenting patients had no emboli (7.5%), whereas 29 carotid endarterectomy patients had no emboli (38.7%).
Conclusion: The percutaneous angioplasty with stenting procedure is associated with more than eight times the rate of microemboli seen during carotid endarterectomy when evaluated with transcranial Doppler monitoring. Larger patient groups are needed to determine if this greater embolization rate has an associated risk of higher morbidity or mortality.
Similar articles
-
Cerebral microemboli and brain injury during carotid artery endarterectomy and stenting.Stroke. 2009 Jan;40(1):230-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513341. Epub 2008 Oct 16. Stroke. 2009. PMID: 18927460
-
Transcranial Doppler monitoring in angioplasty and stenting of the carotid bifurcation.J Endovasc Ther. 2003 Aug;10(4):702-10. doi: 10.1177/152660280301000404. J Endovasc Ther. 2003. PMID: 14533974
-
Carotid angioplasty and stenting: treatment of postcarotid endarterectomy restenosis is at least as safe as primary stenosis treatment.J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct;50(4):755-761.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.060. Epub 2009 Jul 3. J Vasc Surg. 2009. PMID: 19576717
-
Transcranial Doppler monitoring for microemboli: a marker of a high-risk carotid plaque.Semin Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;30(1):62-66. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 27. Semin Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28818260 Review.
-
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022. Am J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18154764 Review.
Cited by
-
Reversal of flow during carotid artery stenting: use of the Parodi antiembolism system.Neuroradiology. 2007 Mar;49(3):237-41. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0178-9. Epub 2007 Jan 5. Neuroradiology. 2007. PMID: 17205314
-
Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after stent implantation in the carotid artery.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Feb;23(2):200-7. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002. PMID: 11847042 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative analysis of transcranial Doppler parameters acquired during carotid stenting and semi-eversion carotid endarterectomy.J Vasc Bras. 2016 Jul-Sep;15(3):197-204. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.003316. J Vasc Bras. 2016. PMID: 29930590 Free PMC article.
-
Expanding use of embolic protection devices.Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008 Mar;25(1):27-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052303. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008. PMID: 21326490 Free PMC article.
-
Distal protection devices during percutaneous coronary and carotid interventions.Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001;2(6):286-291. doi: 10.1186/cvm-2-6-286. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001. PMID: 11806815 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources