Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Mar;229(3):344-9.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199903000-00007.

Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates

Affiliations

Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates

P M Rao et al. Ann Surg. 1999 Mar.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of appendiceal computed tomography (CT) availability on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates.

Summary background data: Appendiceal CT is 98% accurate. However, its impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates has not been reported.

Methods: The authors reviewed the medical records of 493 consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy between 1992 and 1995, 209 consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy in 1997 (59% of whom had appendiceal CT), and 206 patients who underwent appendiceal CT in 1997 without subsequent appendectomy.

Results: Before appendiceal CT, 98/493 patients (20%) taken to surgery had a normal appendix. After CT availability, 15/209 patients (7%) taken to surgery had a normal appendix; 7 patients did not have CT, 5 patients had surgery despite a negative CT, and 3 patients had a false-positive CT. Negative appendectomy rates were lowered overall (20% to 7%), in men (11% to 5%), in women (35% to 11%), in boys (10% to 5%), and in girls (18% to 12%). Appendiceal perforation rates dropped from 22% to 14% after CT availability. CT excluded appendicitis in 206 patients in 1997 who avoided appendectomy and identified alternative diagnoses in 105 of these patients (51%).

Conclusion: The availability of appendiceal CT coincided with a drop in the negative appendectomy rate from 20% to 7% in all patients, and to only 3% in patients with a positive CT. Perforation rates decreased from 22% to 14%. Appendiceal CT can be advocated in nearly all female and many male patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • The introduction of appendiceal CT.
    Strate T, Schneider CG, Bloechle C, Izbicki JR. Strate T, et al. Ann Surg. 2000 Nov;232(5):721. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00018. Ann Surg. 2000. PMID: 11066147 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Br Med J. 1972 Apr 1;2(5804):9-13 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1975 May;110(5):677-84 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1981 Feb;141(2):232-4 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1983 Jan;28(1):35-40 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985 Jul-Aug;9(4):784-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms