Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Jun;79(6):568-75.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.6.568.

Superiority of ibutilide (a new class III agent) over DL-sotalol in converting atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. The Ibutilide/Sotalol Comparator Study Group

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Superiority of ibutilide (a new class III agent) over DL-sotalol in converting atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. The Ibutilide/Sotalol Comparator Study Group

M A Vos et al. Heart. 1998 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of a single dose of ibutilide, a new class III antiarrhythmic drug, with that of DL-sotalol in terminating chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter in haemodynamically stable patients.

Design: Double blind, randomised study.

Setting: 43 European hospitals.

Patients: 308 patients (mean age 60 years, 70% men, 48% with heart disease) with sustained atrial fibrillation (n = 251) or atrial flutter (n = 57) (duration three hours to 45 days) were randomised to three groups to receive a 10 minute infusion of 1 mg ibutilide (n = 99), 2 mg ibutilide (n = 106), or 1.5 mg/kg DL-sotalol (n = 103). Infusion was discontinued at termination of the arrhythmia.

Main outcome measure: Successful conversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter, defined as termination of arrhythmia within one hour of treatment.

Results: Both drugs were more effective against atrial flutter than against atrial fibrillation. Ibutilide was superior to DL-sotalol for treating atrial flutter (70% and 56% v 19%), while the high dose of ibutilide was more effective for treating atrial fibrillation than DL-sotalol (44% v 11%) and the lower dose of ibutilide (44% v 20%, p < 0.01). The mean (SD) time to arrhythmia termination was 13 (7) minutes with 2 mg ibutilide, 19 (15) minutes with 1 mg ibutilide, and 25 (17) minutes with DL-sotalol. In all patients, the duration of arrhythmia before treatment was a predictor of arrhythmia termination, although this was less obvious in the group that received 2 mg ibutilide. This dose converted almost 48% of atrial fibrillation that was present for more than 30 days. Concomitant use of digitalis or nifedipine and prolongation of the QTc interval were not predictive of arrhythmia termination. Bradycardia (6.5%) and hypotension (3.7%) were more common side effects with DL-sotalol. Of 211 patients given ibutilide, two (0.9%) who received the higher dose developed polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, one of whom required direct current cardioversion.

Conclusion: Ibutilide (given in 1 or 2 mg doses over 10 minutes) is highly effective for rapidly terminating persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. This new class III drug, under monitored conditions, is a potential alternative to currently available cardioversion options.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of conversion rates induced by the two doses of ibutilide and sotalol in patients with atrial flutter and fibrillation. Numbers are total number of patients entered into each group.*p < 0.05 compared with sotalol; †p < 0.05 compared with 1 mg ibutilide.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Successful conversion rates of atrial flutter and fibrillation for the two doses of ibutilide and sotalol in relation to duration of the arrhythmia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Onset of the single sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia that required electrocardioversion from the Holter recording occurring 11 minutes after the start of 2 mg ibutilide infusion. Note that a longer RR interval and a prolonged QT interval precede the ventricular arrhythmia.

References

    1. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Mar 1;59(6):607-9 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1997 Dec 16;96(12):4298-306 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1988 Feb;62(2):395-410 - PubMed
    1. Eur Heart J. 1988 Jun;9(6):634-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1990 Jan 1;65(1):67-71 - PubMed