Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Mar;25(3):399-404.
doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80089-3.

Binocular function after bilateral implantation of monofocal and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Binocular function after bilateral implantation of monofocal and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses

B Arens et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate binocular function after bilateral implantation of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods: Contrast sensitivity, glare, depth discrimination, and distance and near visual acuity were examined in 21 patients with a multifocal IOL and 15 patients with a monofocal IOL.

Results: There was no significant difference in binocular distance visual acuity between the 2 groups. In near visual acuity with distance correction, the multifocal group had a significant advantage in monocular and binocular vision (P < .05). High contrast with Regan contrast letter acuity charts did not differ significantly between the groups. However, at a contrast of 11%, sensitivity was significantly lower monocularly in the multifocal group. Contrast sensitivity in this group was not significantly lower binocularly. The brightness acuity tester revealed no between-group difference in glare. With the Titmus stereotest, depth discrimination was significantly better with the multifocal IOL with distance correction.

Conclusion: Bilateral implantation of a refractive multifocal IOL provided good binocular function and alleviated the well-known disadvantage of reduced contrast sensitivity at low contrast levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types