Accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight in very small infants
- PMID: 10079487
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13020099.x
Accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight in very small infants
Abstract
Objective: Fetal outcome is inversely related to gestational age and birth weight. Therefore, in very small fetuses, estimated weight may play an important role in clinical management. Our aim was to determine the accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight in very small infants.
Design: Retrospective chart review.
Subjects: We retrospectively studied 100 consecutive infants with a birth weight of < 1000 g, at a gestational age between 24.0 and 34.0 weeks, in which biometric data < 2 weeks prior to delivery were available for analysis.
Methods: We estimated fetal weight with the use of two methods--by those of Hadlock and colleagues and Scott and colleagues--and compared the estimated values with measured birth weights.
Results: The infants had a mean birth weight of 742 +/- 173 (SD) g, at a gestational age of 28.1 +/- 2.0 (SD) weeks. With Hadlock's method, the mean estimated fetal weight (EFW) was 736 +/- 186 (SD) g, which was not significantly different from birth weight; the mean EFW error was 0.8 +/- 12.7 (SD) %. With Scott's method, the mean EFW was 780 +/- 185 (SD) g, which was significantly increased above birth weight; the mean EFW error was 5.7 +/- 12.5 (SD) %. The accuracy of the weight estimates was not significantly affected by the period between ultrasound examination and delivery if < 2 weeks, or by fetal growth restriction.
Conclusion: In our population of small fetuses, Hadlock's estimates of fetal weight correlated well with measured birth weight, whereas Scott's method tended to overestimate.
Similar articles
-
Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Feb;130(2):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.018. Epub 2006 May 23. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007. PMID: 16720074
-
Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;29(5):550-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.4019. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17444561
-
Sonographic examination does not predict twin growth discordance accurately.Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):529-33. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00010-0. Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 9083307 Review.
-
A new formula for calculating weight in the fetus of < or = 1600 g.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;24(7):775-80. doi: 10.1002/uog.1741. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15476297
-
Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: use of targeted formulas in small for gestational age fetuses.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):359-64. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8355934 Review.
Cited by
-
A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 May;28(7):745-54. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.934218. Epub 2014 Jul 11. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015. PMID: 24993892 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical