Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Mar;48(3):188-95.

Comanagement of patients with congestive heart failure by family physicians and cardiologists: frequency, timing, and patient characteristics

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10086761

Comanagement of patients with congestive heart failure by family physicians and cardiologists: frequency, timing, and patient characteristics

P M Diller et al. J Fam Pract. 1999 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Many patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) receive care solely from a primary care physician, while some receive care from both a primary care physician and a cardiologist. Patients in the latter type of care relationships have not been described. The principal objectives of our study were to determine what percentage of patients with CHF are comanaged, the characteristics of comanaged CHF patients, and when in the natural history of CHF this relationship is initiated.

Methods: A retrospective record review was conducted of all patients who met the modified Framingham criteria for the diagnosis of CHF in a large community-based family practice office. Comanagement was defined as an ongoing relationship with a cardiologist characterized by a minimum of one visit to the cardiologist's office in the year of evaluation. We divided the natural history of CHF into 4 stages to describe the timing of the initial referral to the cardiologist: I Prediagnosis; II Diagnosis; III Progression; and IV Terminal.

Results: Of 151 patients identified with CHF, 36% of the patients were comanaged by a primary care physician and a cardiologist. The comanagement relationship often began early in the development of CHF, 20% at stage I and 54% at stage II. The patients who were comanaged were younger, predominately men, had a greater frequency of myocardial infarction, were more likely to have decreased systolic function, were on more cardiac medications, and had fewer hospitalizations for CHF exacerbations compared with CHF patients managed solely by family physicians.

Conclusions: Comanagement of patients with CHF is a common occurrence, and comanaged CHF patients have distinct characteristics from those managed solely by family physicians. These results have implications for the quality and cost of caring for patients with CHF and suggest that more detailed study is required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources