Estimating the proportion of unnecessary Cesarean sections in Ohio using birth certificate data
- PMID: 10086827
- DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00125-5
Estimating the proportion of unnecessary Cesarean sections in Ohio using birth certificate data
Erratum in
- J Clin Epidemiol 1999 Apr;52(4):379
Abstract
The main objective of the study is to present a method that estimates the proportion of unnecessary Cesarean sections (C-sections) using birth certificate data. This population-based cross-sectional study uses two major databases--Ohio birth certificates and Medicaid eligibility files--and includes singleton infants born during the period July 1991 through June 1993 (n = 262,013). A total of 57 variables indicative of adverse events, including maternal medical risk factors, complications of labor and delivery, and congenital anomalies that are available on the birth certificate, are examined to estimate the rate of unnecessary C-sections. The results obtained through this method indicate that nearly 40% of the repeat C-sections had no documented abnormalities on the birth certificate to justify a C-section. Because studies using medical records have yielded similar results, we believe that using birth certificate data may be a reliable method to measure and monitor the rate of unnecessary C-sections.
Similar articles
-
Declining trends in cesarean deliveries, Ohio 1989-1996: an analysis by indications.Birth. 2000 Mar;27(1):12-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00012.x. Birth. 2000. PMID: 10865555
-
Unnecessary cesarean delivery in Louisiana: an analysis of birth certificate data.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;190(1):10-9; discussion 3A. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.009. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 14749628
-
Relative risk of postpartum complications in the Ohio Medicaid population: vaginal versus cesarean delivery.Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Jun;61(2):203-24. doi: 10.1177/1077558703260123. Med Care Res Rev. 2004. PMID: 15155052
-
The reliability and validity of birth certificates.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;35(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00016.x. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16466348 Review.
-
What Are Optimal Cesarean Section Rates in the U.S. and How Do We Get There? A Review of Evidence-Based Recommendations and Interventions.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Dec;26(12):1285-1291. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6188. Epub 2017 Aug 21. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017. PMID: 28825512 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
'Maternal Request' Caesarean Sections and Medical Necessity.Clin Ethics. 2023 Sep;18(3):312-320. doi: 10.1177/14777509231183365. Epub 2023 Jun 26. Clin Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37635933 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information.Matern Child Health J. 2002 Sep;6(3):169-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1019726112597. Matern Child Health J. 2002. PMID: 12236664
-
Standardized protocol for labor induction: a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Dec 10;41:100956. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100956. eCollection 2025 Jan. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024. PMID: 39737251 Free PMC article.
-
Practice audits to reduce caesareans in a tertiary referral hospital in south-western China.Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Jul 1;90(7):488-94. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.093369. Epub 2012 Mar 13. Bull World Health Organ. 2012. PMID: 22807594 Free PMC article.
-
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30264405 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical