Minicholecystectomy: a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure
- PMID: 10088574
- DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.134.3.308
Minicholecystectomy: a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure
Abstract
Objective: To document effectiveness of minicholecystectomy as a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure with rapid return to work.
Design: Review of medical records.
Setting: Small community hospital.
Patients: A total of 1207 patients who underwent minicholecystectomies from January 1, 1986, through December 31, 1997.
Intervention: Minicholecystectomy.
Main outcome measures: Complications, length of hospital stay, cost, and time until return to work.
Results: Of the 1207 patients who underwent minicholecystectomy, 74% were admitted for day surgery, 88% of whom were discharged in less than 12 hours, 9.3% in 24 hours or less, and 1.7% in greater than 24 hours; 0.3% were readmitted within 2 weeks. The complication rate was 0.2%; 2 cases required laparotomy, with no common duct injuries. The cost of the procedure was S435; the average time it took working patients to return to work was 11.4 days.
Conclusions: Minicholecystectomy is a safe, inexpensive day surgery method of cholecystectomy with minimal time off work after surgery.
Similar articles
-
Dollars and cents: minicholecystectomy and early discharge.South Med J. 1988 Feb;81(2):161-3. South Med J. 1988. PMID: 3340867
-
Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a community-based hospital perspective.Am Surg. 2003 Jul;69(7):604-7. Am Surg. 2003. PMID: 12889625
-
Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Jun;11(3):182-4. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001. PMID: 11444748
-
[Micro and mini-cholecystectomies in the 21st century].Orv Hetil. 2003 Jun 29;144(26):1291-7. Orv Hetil. 2003. PMID: 12894673 Review. Hungarian.
-
Can abdominal surgical emergencies be treated in an ambulatory setting?J Visc Surg. 2015 Dec;152(6 Suppl):S81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Oct 27. J Visc Surg. 2015. PMID: 26522504 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.Ann Surg. 2001 Dec;234(6):741-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200112000-00005. Ann Surg. 2001. PMID: 11729380 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Costs and quality of life of small-incision open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - an expertise-based randomised controlled trial.BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0601-1. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28388942 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD006229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006229. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 17054284 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave outweighs efforts in hospital savings.Trials. 2009 Sep 4;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-80. Trials. 2009. PMID: 19732431 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective, randomized study comparing minilaparotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day-surgery procedure: 5-year outcome.Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):827-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3214-y. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Surg Endosc. 2014. PMID: 24196543 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources