Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Mar 25;340(12):928-36.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903253401206.

Views of managed care--a survey of students, residents, faculty, and deans at medical schools in the United States

Affiliations
Free article

Views of managed care--a survey of students, residents, faculty, and deans at medical schools in the United States

S R Simon et al. N Engl J Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background and methods: Views of managed care among academic physicians and medical students in the United States are not well known. In 1997, we conducted a telephone survey of a national sample of medical students (506 respondents), residents (494), faculty members (728), department chairs (186), directors of residency training in internal medicine and pediatrics (143), and deans (105) at U.S. medical schools to determine their experiences in and perspectives on managed care. The overall rate of response was 80.1 percent.

Results: Respondents rated their attitudes toward managed care on a 0-to-10 scale, with 0 defined as "as negative as possible" and 10 as "as positive as possible." The expressed attitudes toward managed care were negative, ranging from a low mean (+/-SD) score of 3.9+/-1.7 for residents to a high of 5.0+/-1.3 for deans. When asked about specific aspects of care, fee-for-service medicine was rated better than managed care in terms of access (by 80.2 percent of respondents), minimizing ethical conflicts (74.8 percent), and the quality of the doctor-patient relationship (70.6 percent). With respect to the continuity of care, 52.0 percent of respondents preferred fee-for-service medicine, and 29.3 percent preferred managed care. For care at the end of life, 49.1 percent preferred fee-for-service medicine, and 20.5 percent preferred managed care. With respect to care for patients with chronic illness, 41.8 percent preferred fee-for-service care, and 30.8 percent preferred managed care. Faculty members, residency-training directors, and department chairs responded that managed care had reduced the time they had available for research (63.1 percent agreed) and teaching (58.9 percent) and had reduced their income (55.8 percent). Overall, 46.6 percent of faculty members, 26.7 percent of residency-training directors, and 42.7 percent of department chairs reported that the message they delivered to students about managed care was negative.

Conclusions: Negative views of managed care are widespread among medical students, residents, faculty members, and medical school deans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Medical education and managed care.
    Michels R. Michels R. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 25;340(12):959-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903253401212. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 10094638 No abstract available.
  • Views of managed care.
    Brett AS. Brett AS. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 19;341(8):616; author reply 617-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908193410817. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 10475817 No abstract available.
  • Views of managed care.
    Norman GK, Scherger JE. Norman GK, et al. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 19;341(8):616; author reply 617-8. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 10475818 No abstract available.
  • Views of managed care.
    Wald PS, Brody MR. Wald PS, et al. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 19;341(8):616-7; author reply 617-8. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 10475819 No abstract available.
  • Views of managed care.
    David DS. David DS. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 19;341(8):617-8. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 10475820 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources