Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Winter;7(4):345-52.
doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.345.

State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system

Affiliations

State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system

M H Alciati et al. Tob Control. 1998 Winter.

Abstract

Objective: To develop and implement a rating system evaluating the extensiveness of state laws restricting youth access to tobacco.

Design: State laws on youth access to tobacco were analysed and assigned ratings on nine items. Six items addressed specific tobacco-control provisions, and three related to enforcement provisions. For each item, a target was specified reflecting public health objectives. Achieving the target resulted in a rating of +4 points; for three items, a rating of +5 was possible if the target was exceeded. Criteria for lower ratings were established for situations when the target was not met.

Setting: United States.

Results: State scores (sum of the ratings across all nine items) ranged from 0-18 in 1993, 2-21 in 1994, and 1-21 in 1995 and 1996, out of a possible total of 39. The average score across states was 7.2 in 1993, 7.9 in 1994, 8.2 in 1995, and 9.0 in 1996. The overall mean rating (per item) was 0.80 in 1993, 0.88 in 1994, 0.91 in 1995, and 1.00 in 1996, on a scale where 4.0 indicates that the target goals (per item) were met. From 1993 to 1996, scores increased for 20 states, decreased for one state, and remained unchanged for the others. The number of states for which state preemption of local tobacco regulation was a factor doubled from 10 states in 1993 to 20 states in 1996.

Conclusions: Although all states have laws addressing youth access to tobacco, this analysis reveals that, as of the end of 1996, the progress towards meeting health policy targets is slow, and state legislation that preempts local tobacco regulation is becoming more common.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. JAMA. 1995 Mar 8;273(10):805-7 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1995 Jul 20;333(3):186-9 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19;274(3):199-200, 202 - PubMed
    1. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(1):48-65 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1281-4 - PubMed