Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Apr;117(4):714-8.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70291-6.

Sirolimus (rapamycin) potentiates cyclosporine in prevention of acute lung rejection

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Sirolimus (rapamycin) potentiates cyclosporine in prevention of acute lung rejection

J Longoria et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens (INN: ciclosporin) in human lung transplantation continue to result in a high incidence of acute cellular rejection. We investigated the use of sirolimus, a macrolide with structural similarity to tacrolimus, as monotherapy and in combination with cyclosporine in a rodent lung transplant model.

Methods: Orthotopic left lung transplantation was performed in Lewis recipients from Brown-Norway donor rats with syngeneic Lewis-to-Lewis controls. Open biopsies were performed on postoperative day 7, and the severity of acute lung rejection was graded by a pathologist blinded to the protocol.

Results: All recipients survived despite the amount of acute rejection seen on examination of the biopsy tissue. Lewis-to-Lewis isografts demonstrated near normal pulmonary architecture. Allogeneic recipients receiving high-dose cyclosporine (25 mg/kg) monotherapy showed mild to moderate acute rejection with some perivascular focal interstitial infiltrates. Recipients receiving low-dose cyclosporine (5 mg/kg) monotherapy or low- or high-dose sirolimus (0.5 or 2.0 mg/kg, respectively) monotherapy demonstrated massive cellular infiltration leading to necrosis and infarction and could not be graded. However, the addition of low-dose sirolimus (0.5 mg/kg) to low-dose cyclosporine (5 mg/kg) demonstrated a significant potentiating immunosuppressive effect, and the addition of high-dose sirolimus (2.0 mg/kg) to low-dose cyclosporine (5.0 mg/kg) demonstrated an even greater effect, with rejection scores better than those obtained with high-dose cyclosporine monotherapy and similar to those obtained with isografts.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that low-dose sirolimus has a cyclosporine-sparing effect and that a higher dose of sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine strongly protects lung allografts from acute cellular rejection. These results suggest that sirolimus may be indicated as an adjunct to current cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens in clinical lung transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types