Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Apr;117(4):751-8.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70296-5.

Experimental and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic, absorbable sealant to reduce air leaks in thoracic operations

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Experimental and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic, absorbable sealant to reduce air leaks in thoracic operations

P Macchiarini et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Air leaks after pulmonary resections may contribute to increased patient morbidity, delayed removal of chest drainage tubes, and prolonged hospitalization.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a new synthetic, absorbable sealant on the healing of healthy bronchial and lung tissues (experimental study) and its safety and efficacy to stop air leaks after lung resection (clinical study).

Methods: Fifteen large white pigs underwent a left upper lobectomy. All parenchymal surgical sites were sealed; the bronchial stump was either stapled, sealed, or both (n = 5 each). In the clinical study, 26 consecutive patients were prospectively randomized, intraoperatively, to standard closure of parenchymal surgical sites with (n = 15) or without (n = 11) the sealant.

Results: In the experimental study, no postoperative air leaks occurred, with intact bronchial closures and normal tissues at death. In the clinical study, 100% of intraoperative leaks were sealed versus 18% of control patients (P =.001). Although 77% (n = 10) of treated patients remained leak-free from the end of the operation to chest tube removal versus 9% (n = 1) of control patients (P =.001), there was no statistical difference in the duration of postoperative chest tube time, hospital stay, or cost. There were no acute or late undesirable side-effects related to the sealant application.

Conclusions: The surgical adhesive investigated here demonstrated a compelling safety profile and significant clinical efficacy to stop air leaks after lung resections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances