Epidemiology of device-associated infections related to a long-term implantable vascular access device
- PMID: 10100545
- DOI: 10.1086/501609
Epidemiology of device-associated infections related to a long-term implantable vascular access device
Abstract
Objective: To examine risk factors for, and determine the incidence of, device-associated infections among patients with an implantable vascular access device.
Setting: Grady Health System, including a 1,000-bed, inner-city, public, teaching hospital and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), oncology, and sickle cell clinics in Atlanta, Georgia.
Patients: 123 consecutive patients who received a PAS-Port implantable venous access device between January 1 and June 30, 1995.
Design: Retrospective cohort study with follow-up > or = 1 year following device implantation.
Results: Underlying illnesses included HIV infection in 66 patients (median CD4 count, 24.4 cells/mm3), malignancy in 51, and sickle cell disease in 6. Mean age of patients was 43.7 years, 50% were male, and 74% were black. Thirty-one (25%) of 123 patients developed a primary or device-associated bloodstream infection (BSI), and 3 of the 31 patients experienced two separate episodes of infection. The overall rate of infection was 1.23 primary BSIs per 1,000 device days. Patients with cancer had a lower rate of infection than those with HIV infection, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.96 vs 1.50 BSIs/1,000 device days; relative risk, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.26). Subgroup analysis of patients with different malignancies indicated that infection rates differed according to type of cancer, and there was a trend for heterogeneity across the different cancer strata (P=.06). Gram-positive pathogens accounted for 60% of the pathogens recovered. Six (19%) of 31 patients who developed an infection did so within the first 14 days after implantation. In 11 (32%) of the 34 BSIs, the port required removal; two patient deaths were attributed to device-associated bacteremias (0.072 deaths/1,000 device days).
Conclusions: Approximately one fourth of patients who had a vascular access device implanted developed a primary BSI, but the overall infection rate (per 1,000 device days) was relatively low, even among those with HIV infection. Primary BSI rates in patients with vascular access devices appeared to differ according to the specific underlying illness.
Similar articles
-
Implantable venous port-related infections in cancer patients.Support Care Cancer. 2004 Mar;12(3):197-201. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0576-z. Epub 2004 Jan 16. Support Care Cancer. 2004. PMID: 14727170
-
Association between risk of bloodstream infection and duration of use of totally implantable access ports and central lines: a 24-month study.Am J Infect Control. 2011 Sep;39(7):e39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Jun 11. Am J Infect Control. 2011. PMID: 21652113
-
Risk factors for nosocomial primary bloodstream infection in pediatric intensive care unit patients: a 2-year prospective cohort study.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;27(6):553-60. doi: 10.1086/505096. Epub 2006 May 31. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16755473
-
Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections.J Intraven Nurs. 2001 May-Jun;24(3):180-205. J Intraven Nurs. 2001. PMID: 11530364 Review.
-
Update: Catheter-related bloodstream infection rates in relation to clinical practice and needleless device type.Can J Infect Control. 2008 Fall;23(3):156-60, 162. Can J Infect Control. 2008. PMID: 19024809 Review.
Cited by
-
Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: 2020 updated guidelines on diagnosis, management, and prevention by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).Ann Hematol. 2021 Jan;100(1):239-259. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04286-x. Epub 2020 Sep 30. Ann Hematol. 2021. PMID: 32997191 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Central Venous Access Devices (CVAD) in Pediatric Oncology Patients-A Single-Center Retrospective Study Over More Than 9 Years.Front Pediatr. 2019 Jun 25;7:260. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00260. eCollection 2019. Front Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31294007 Free PMC article.
-
Femoral Placement of Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports in Patients with Bilateral Breast Cancer.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Jan;76(1):53-58. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558173. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016. PMID: 26855441 Free PMC article.
-
Implantable venous port-related infections in cancer patients.Support Care Cancer. 2004 Mar;12(3):197-201. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0576-z. Epub 2004 Jan 16. Support Care Cancer. 2004. PMID: 14727170
-
Removal of totally implanted venous access ports for suspected infection in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational study.Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Mar 27;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0383-9. Ann Intensive Care. 2018. PMID: 29594891 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials