Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):901-4.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.901.

Multicentre randomised controlled trial of nursing intervention for breathlessness in patients with lung cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Multicentre randomised controlled trial of nursing intervention for breathlessness in patients with lung cancer

M Bredin et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of nursing intervention for breathlessness in patients with lung cancer.

Design: Patients diagnosed with lung cancer participated in a multicentre randomised controlled trial where they either attended a nursing clinic offering intervention for their breathlessness or received best supportive care. The intervention consisted of a range of strategies combining breathing control, activity pacing, relaxation techniques, and psychosocial support. Best supportive care involved receiving standard management and treatment available for breathlessness, and breathing assessments. Participants completed a range of self assessment questionnaires at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks.

Setting: Nursing clinics within 6 hospital settings in the United Kingdom.

Participants: 119 patients diagnosed with small cell or non-small cell lung cancer or with mesothelioma who had completed first line treatment for their disease and reported breathlessness.

Outcome measures: Visual analogue scales measuring distress due to breathlessness, breathlessness at best and worst, WHO performance status scale, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and Rotterdam symptom checklist.

Results: The intervention group improved significantly at 8 weeks in 5 of the 11 items assessed: breathlessness at best, WHO performance status, levels of depression, and two Rotterdam symptom checklist measures (physical symptom distress and breathlessness) and showed slight improvement in 3 of the remaining 6 items.

Conclusion: Most patients who completed the study had a poor prognosis, and breathlessness was typically a symptom of their deteriorating condition. Patients who attended nursing clinics and received the breathlessness intervention experienced improvements in breathlessness, performance status, and physical and emotional states relative to control patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Design of study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O’Driscoll M, Corner J. The experience of breathlessness in lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (in press). - PubMed
    1. Twycross RG, Lack SA. Therapeutics in terminal cancer. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1986.
    1. Muers MF, Round CE. Palliation of symptoms in non-small cell lung cancer: a study by the Yorkshire Regional Cancer Organisation Thoracic Group. Thorax. 1993;48:339–343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corner J, Plant H, Warner L. Developing a nursing approach to managing dyspnoea in lung cancer. Int J Palliative Nurs. 1995;1:5–10. - PubMed
    1. Higginson I, McCarthy M. Measuring symptoms in terminal cancer: are pain and dyspnoea controlled? J R Soc Med. 1989;82:264–267. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types