Practice parameter: the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Quality Improvement. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection
- PMID: 10103321
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.103.4.843
Practice parameter: the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Quality Improvement. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection
Erratum in
- 2000 Jan;105(1 Pt 1):141
- Pediatrics 1999 May;103(5 Pt 1):1052, 1999 Jul;104(1 Pt 1):118
Abstract
Objective: To formulate recommendations for health care professionals about the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of an initial urinary tract infection (UTI) in febrile infants and young children (ages 2 months to 2 years).
Design: Comprehensive search and analysis of the medical literature, supplemented with consensus opinion of Subcommittee members.
Participants: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Quality Improvement selected a Subcommittee composed of pediatricians with expertise in the fields of epidemiology and informatics, infectious diseases, nephrology, pediatric practice, radiology, and urology to draft the parameter. The Subcommittee, the AAP Committee on Quality Improvement, a review panel of office-based practitioners, and other groups within and outside the AAP reviewed and revised the parameter.
Methods: The Subcommittee identified the population at highest risk of incurring renal damage from UTI-infants and young children with UTI and fever. A comprehensive bibliography on UTI in infants and young children was compiled. Literature was abstracted in a formal manner, and evidence tables were constructed. Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analyses were performed to assess various strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation.
Technical report: The overall problem of managing UTI in children between 2 months and 2 years of age was conceptualized as an evidence model. The model depicts the relationship between the steps in diagnosis and management of UTI. The steps are divided into the following four phases: 1) recognizing the child at risk for UTI, 2) making the diagnosis of UTI, 3) short-term treatment of UTI, and 4) evaluation of the child with UTI for possible urinary tract abnormality. Phase 1 represents the recognition of the child at risk for UTI. Age and other clinical features define a prevalence or a prior probability of UTI, determining whether the diagnosis should be pursued. Phase 2 depicts the diagnosis of UTI. Alternative diagnostic strategies may be characterized by their cost, sensitivity, and specificity. The result of testing is the division of patients into groups according to a relatively higher or lower probability of having a UTI. The probability of UTI in each of these groups depends not only on the sensitivity and specificity of the test, but also on the prior probability of the UTI among the children being tested. In this way, the usefulness of a diagnostic test depends on the prior probability of UTI established in Phase 1. Phase 3 represents the short-term treatment of UTI. Alternatives for treatment of UTI may be compared, based on their likelihood of clearing the initial UTI. Phase 4 depicts the imaging evaluation of infants with the diagnosis of UTI to identify those with urinary tract abnormalities such as vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Children with VUR are believed to be at risk for ongoing renal damage with subsequent infections, resulting in hypertension and renal failure. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy or surgical procedures such as ureteral reimplantation may prevent progressive renal damage. Therefore, identifying urinary abnormalities may offer the benefit of preventing hypertension and renal failure. Because the consequences of detection and early management of UTI are affected by subsequent evaluation and long-term management and, likewise, long-term management of patients with UTI depends on how they are detected at the outset, the Subcommittee elected to analyze the entire process from detection of UTI to the evaluation for, and consequences of, urinary tract abnormalities. The full analysis of these data can be found in the technical report. History of the literature review along with evidence-tables and a comprehensive bibliography also are available in the report. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
Comment in
-
Urinary tract infection guidelines questioned.Pediatrics. 2000 Feb;105(2):463-4; author reply 466-7. Pediatrics. 2000. PMID: 10691517 No abstract available.
-
Urinary tract infection guidelines questioned.Pediatrics. 2000 Feb;105(2):464; author reply 466-7. Pediatrics. 2000. PMID: 10691518 No abstract available.
-
Urinary tract infection guidelines questioned.Pediatrics. 2000 Feb;105(2):464-5; author reply 466-7. Pediatrics. 2000. PMID: 10691519 No abstract available.
-
Urinary tract infection guidelines questioned.Pediatrics. 2000 Feb;105(2):465-6; author reply 466-7. Pediatrics. 2000. PMID: 10691520 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Vesicoureteral Reflux.2024 Apr 30. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Apr 30. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 33085409 Free Books & Documents.
-
Technical report: urinary tract infections in febrile infants and young children. The Urinary Tract Subcommittee of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Quality Improvement.Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4):e54. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.4.e54. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 10103346
-
Technical report—Diagnosis and management of an initial UTI in febrile infants and young children.Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):e749-70. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1332. Epub 2011 Aug 28. Pediatrics. 2011. PMID: 21873694
-
Controversy in urinary tract infection management in children: a review of new data and subsequent changes in guidelines.J Trop Pediatr. 2013 Dec;59(6):465-9. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmt054. Epub 2013 Jun 28. J Trop Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23812014 Review.
-
Evaluation and management of recurrent urinary tract infections in children: state of the art.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015 Feb;13(2):209-31. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.991717. Epub 2014 Dec 9. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015. PMID: 25488064 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of non-E. coli urinary tract infections.Arch Dis Child. 2006 Oct;91(10):845-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.080721. Epub 2006 May 22. Arch Dis Child. 2006. PMID: 16717085 Free PMC article.
-
Urinary tract infections in children: recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis and evaluation. An evidence-based approach.Curr Urol Rep. 2010 Mar;11(2):98-108. doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0095-7. Curr Urol Rep. 2010. PMID: 20425097 Review.
-
Management of urinary tract infections.Indian J Pediatr. 2003 Mar;70(3):235-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02725591. Indian J Pediatr. 2003. PMID: 12785296
-
Vesicoureteral reflux in children with suspected and proven urinary tract infection.Pediatr Nephrol. 2010 Aug;25(8):1463-9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1542-x. Epub 2010 May 14. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010. PMID: 20467791
-
The "top-down" approach to the evaluation of children with febrile urinary tract infection.Adv Urol. 2009;2009:783409. doi: 10.1155/2009/783409. Epub 2009 Mar 30. Adv Urol. 2009. PMID: 19343189 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous