Allocation of attention during visual word recognition
- PMID: 1011005
- DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.2.4.556
Allocation of attention during visual word recognition
Abstract
A dual-task paradigm was used to assess attentional processing demands during visual word recognition. By manipulating the difficulty of each task, it is argued that the procedure estimates the attention demands of the memory-access component of word recognition. Specifically, the the complexity of the secondary task was varied from a simple reaction time task to a choice reaction time task, and the difficulty of a lexical decision (word vs. nonword) primary task was varied by manipulating word frequency. A comparison of the effect of secondary task complexity across levels of word frequency showed that the difference between the two secondary tasks was larger for low-frequency words than for high-frequency words. This result, supported by other characteristics of the data, suggests that the memory-access processing in one type of word recognition task does demand attention.
Similar articles
-
Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 May;18(2):460-70. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.2.460. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992. PMID: 1593230
-
The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):112-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.125. Epub 2006 Feb 21. Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16497283
-
Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Nov;14(4):601-9. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.4.601. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988. PMID: 2974871
-
Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.Psychol Rev. 1976 Mar;83(2):157-71. Psychol Rev. 1976. PMID: 769017 Review. No abstract available.
-
Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):813-40. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.813. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993. PMID: 8345326 Review.
Cited by
-
Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition.J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 May;31(3):289-306. doi: 10.1023/a:1015544213366. J Psycholinguist Res. 2002. PMID: 12092712
-
Divided attention modulates semantic activation: evidence from a nonletter-level prime task.Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):2001-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03192932. Mem Cognit. 2007. PMID: 18265615
-
Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task.Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):833-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03211402. Mem Cognit. 1998. PMID: 9701974
-
Frequency and regularity effects in reading are task dependent: Evidence from ERPs.Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;29(10):1342-1355. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.927067. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25436218 Free PMC article.
-
Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies.Mem Cognit. 1980 Nov;8(6):493-512. doi: 10.3758/bf03213769. Mem Cognit. 1980. PMID: 7219170 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources