Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1993 Jan-Feb;9(1):18-24.

Radiographic contrast media: an introduction to its use, adverse-effect profile, and economic impact

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10123761
Review

Radiographic contrast media: an introduction to its use, adverse-effect profile, and economic impact

L M Gersema. J Pharm Technol. 1993 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To provide an overview of the development, chemistry, adverse-effect profile, and economic impact of radiographic contrast media (CM).

Data sources: Information was collected by conducting a MEDLINE search for clinical trials, reviews, and other articles pertaining to the use of CM. References cited in published review articles and manufacturer's product information also were used.

Study selection: Studies, review articles, and editorials were selected for review if they addressed the synthesis, clinical use, or economic impact of CM. Comparative studies conducted in humans were used to address the adverse-effect profile of CM.

Data extraction: Data were extracted from reviews and editorials when the information from multiple sources was consistent and pertained to the purpose of this review. Comparative reviews addressing adverse reactions were reviewed by the author for appropriate methodology and reporting of results.

Data synthesis: Radiographic CM are iodine-containing compounds that can be injected intravascularly or intrathecally for multiple diagnostic tests. CM are differentiated according to water solubility, viscosity, radiopacity, and osmolality. In the past decade, low-osmolality CM (LOCM) have been developed that may impart fewer adverse effects, such as flushing, nausea, vomiting, allergic reactions, cardiovascular effects, and nephrotoxicity. The use of LOCM has steadily increased since their introduction in 1985. The cost of LOCM is approximately 10-to 20-fold higher than previously available CM. This represents a growing financial burden to the healthcare system.

Conclusions: CM are an integral tool in diagnostic medicine. LOCM appear to be safer than previous agents; however, they are also more expensive. Balancing safety and financial concerns will be a recurring issue facing both the medical society and third-party payers when selecting appropriate CM to administer to patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources