Point and counterpoint. Should incompetent patients (and their families) be provided professional advocates for an HEC concurrent case review?
- PMID: 10135102
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01463650
Point and counterpoint. Should incompetent patients (and their families) be provided professional advocates for an HEC concurrent case review?
Similar articles
-
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs make de facto binding decisions?HEC Forum. 1994 May;6(3):176-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01463652. HEC Forum. 1994. PMID: 10135103
-
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs involved in case review have a healthcare ethics consultant?HEC Forum. 1993 May;5(3):196-204. doi: 10.1007/BF01463893. HEC Forum. 1993. PMID: 10127442
-
Should competent patients or their families be notified before HECs review the patients' cases? Yes.HEC Forum. 1994 Jul;6(4):257-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01452475. HEC Forum. 1994. PMID: 10137307
-
Is ethics consultation an elegant distraction?HEC Forum. 1996 Jan;8(1):12-21; discussion 22-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00057972. HEC Forum. 1996. PMID: 10156357 Review. No abstract available.
-
Ethics consultation.Crit Care Clin. 1996 Jan;12(1):49-70. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70214-1. Crit Care Clin. 1996. PMID: 8821009 Review.