Point and counterpoint. Should HECs make de facto binding decisions?
- PMID: 10135103
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01463652
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs make de facto binding decisions?
Abstract
It is evident that HEC decisions are de facto binding. Our challenge is to recognize the implications of these decisions for patient care. As a result of the passage of the Patient Self-Determination Act and the recent JCAHO rules mandating dispute resolving mechanisms for ethical issues, case review by ethics committees will undoubtedly have an even greater influence on patient care. Therefore, health care institutions and their medical staffs must strive to find the best way to use the inherent powers of hospital ethics committees to enhance patient care decisionmaking.
Similar articles
-
Point and counterpoint. Should incompetent patients (and their families) be provided professional advocates for an HEC concurrent case review?HEC Forum. 1994 May;6(3):170-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01463650. HEC Forum. 1994. PMID: 10135102 No abstract available.
-
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs involved in case review have a healthcare ethics consultant?HEC Forum. 1993 May;5(3):196-204. doi: 10.1007/BF01463893. HEC Forum. 1993. PMID: 10127442
-
Hospital ethics committees in practice: the case review function of four HECs in Connecticut.HEC Forum. 1994 Mar;6(2):73-84. doi: 10.1007/BF01463221. HEC Forum. 1994. PMID: 10134307 No abstract available.
-
Ethics consultation.Crit Care Clin. 1996 Jan;12(1):49-70. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70214-1. Crit Care Clin. 1996. PMID: 8821009 Review.
-
Exploring the role of the ethics committee psychiatrist.HEC Forum. 1992;4(6):360-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02217982. HEC Forum. 1992. PMID: 10123220 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials