Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Nov;4(5):345-52.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00005.

The episode-free day as a composite measure of effectiveness: an illustrative economic evaluation of formoterol versus salbutamol in asthma therapy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The episode-free day as a composite measure of effectiveness: an illustrative economic evaluation of formoterol versus salbutamol in asthma therapy

M J Sculpher et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov.

Abstract

The construction of a composite effectiveness measure was explored using clinical data collected routinely in trials of drug therapies for asthma. The measure is the episode-free day (EFD), where an 'episode' is either an asthma attack, the need for rescue medication, sleep disturbance caused by asthma, or an adverse event. The EFD measure was used in a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of a previous Phase III controlled clinical trial of formoterol versus salbutamol, in which 145 patients with bronchial asthma were randomised to receive maintenance therapy with either inhaled formoterol or inhaled salbutamol over a 12-week period. Average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were assessed for the 2 drugs in terms of the total expected cost of drug plus rescue therapy, and EFD rates. The analysis suggests that, with relatively little addition to clinical data collection, economically and clinically meaningful composite measures can be constructed to assist in making cost-effectiveness comparisons between alternative asthma therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 May;45(5):461-72 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Sep;2(3):207-18 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Sep;144(3 Pt 1):622-5 - PubMed
    1. J Psychosom Res. 1991;35(1):99-110 - PubMed