Factors influencing the performance of temporary skin substitutes
- PMID: 10149130
- DOI: 10.1016/0267-6605(91)90050-p
Factors influencing the performance of temporary skin substitutes
Abstract
Advances in our knowledge of the wound healing process has led to the development of various synthetic skin substitutes, which when applied to the wound surface provide a microclimate conducive to healing. The requirements of an ideal temporary skin substitute are presented. This review also provides an updated account of the preclinical evaluation procedures utilized to assess these demands, particularly important parameters such as water vapour permeability, adherence to excised wound surface, oxygen permeability, mechanical properties, microbial permeability and exudate soaking capacity.
Similar articles
-
Preclinical evaluation of skin substitutes.Burns. 1990 Oct;16(5):358-67. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(90)90009-l. Burns. 1990. PMID: 2275766
-
[Clinical evaluation of hydrogel-type dressing materials after their 8-year use].Polim Med. 1991;21(1-2):23-30. Polim Med. 1991. PMID: 1815231 Clinical Trial. Polish.
-
Wound infection under occlusive dressings.J Hosp Infect. 1991 Feb;17(2):83-94. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90172-5. J Hosp Infect. 1991. PMID: 1674265 Review.
-
Exudate-handling mechanisms of two foam-film dressings.J Wound Care. 2008 Jul;17(7):309-15. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2008.17.7.30524. J Wound Care. 2008. PMID: 18705233
-
Characteristics and uses of biologic dressings and skin substitutes.Arch Surg. 1984 Mar;119(3):312-22. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390150050013. Arch Surg. 1984. PMID: 6365034 Review.
Cited by
-
Preparation and characterization of electrospun PCL/PLGA membranes and chitosan/gelatin hydrogels for skin bioengineering applications.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011 Oct;22(10):2207-18. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4402-8. Epub 2011 Jul 31. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011. PMID: 21805330