Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Jul-Aug;9(6):443-55.
doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-9.6.443.

Evaluation of the Heart To Heart Project: lessons from a community-based chronic disease prevention project

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Heart To Heart Project: lessons from a community-based chronic disease prevention project

R M Goodman et al. Am J Health Promot. 1995 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To present an evaluation of a 5-year, community-based, chronic disease prevention project managed by a state health department to determine whether the department could replicate similar previous projects that had received more funding and other resources.

Design: The evaluation used a matched comparison design and a review of archive and interview data.

Setting: Florence, South Carolina (population: 56,240).

Subjects: A random sample of 1642 persons in Florence (and 1551 in the comparison) who responded to a risk factor questionnaire and underwent a physical assessment; 70.7% of baseline subjects participated in the postintervention. Forty key persons were interviewed concerning project effectiveness. INTERVENTIONS BY PROJECT: Walk-a-thons, a speakers' bureau, media messages, restaurant food labeling, and cooking seminars. More than 31,000 participants were involved in 585 activities.

Measures: Questionnaires focused on hypertension, obesity, high cholesterol, smoking, and exercise. Physical assessments determined lipid, lipoprotein, apolipoprotein, and blood pressure levels. Analysis of covariance was used for baseline and postintervention comparisons. Content analysis was used on archive and interview data.

Results: The project had a slightly favorable intervention effect on cholesterol and smoking, but failed to have an effect on other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The project influenced community awareness, enlisted influential community members, and fostered linkages among local health services.

Conclusions: Health departments can be instrumental in community risk reduction programming; however, they may not replicate projects having greater resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources