Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1995 May;7(5):393-402.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507050-00004.

Once-daily aminoglycoside administration in gram-negative sepsis. Economic and practical aspects

Affiliations
Review

Once-daily aminoglycoside administration in gram-negative sepsis. Economic and practical aspects

S E Parker et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 May.

Abstract

A fuller understanding of the pharmacodynamics of aminoglycoside antibiotics now exists compared with when they were introduced. Recent findings have shown that once-daily dosage regimens of aminoglycosides are as effective as bd or tid regimens in the treatment of Gram-negative sepsis. However, radical changes in dosage frequency based on this knowledge are resisted by some physicians because of fears about the peak concentration toxicity of aminoglycosides. These fears have been shown to be misplaced. The delay in the translation of research findings into practice may be attributable to the sheer quantity of medical literature and the limited time that clinicians have available to read it. Because healthcare resources are finite, physicians are increasingly becoming aware of the need to use drug therapy in the most cost-effective way. An important component of aminoglycoside therapy that may persuade clinicians to change their practice is the organised consideration of the various costs associated with different administration regimens. This review examines the source of those costs, and endorses once-daily dosage of aminoglycosides from both an economic and practical viewpoint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 1993 Feb 6;341(8841):335-9 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1988 Jul;158(1):1-6 - PubMed
    1. Med J Aust. 1989 Aug 21;151(4):224-32 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1984 Oct;77(4):657-62 - PubMed
    1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jan;31(1):4-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources