Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1995 Jun;7(6):503-20.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00005.

Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index

Affiliations
Review

Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index

G W Torrance et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Jun.

Abstract

Multi-attribute utility theory, an extension of conventional utility theory, can be applied to model preference scores for health states defined by multi-attribute health status classification systems. The type of preference independence among the attributes determines the type of preference function required: additive, multiplicative or multilinear. In addition, the type of measurement instrument used determines the type of preference score obtained: value or utility. Multi-attribute utility theory has been applied to 2 recently developed multi-attribute health status classification systems, the Health Utilities Index (HUI) Mark II and Mark III systems. Results are presented for the Mark II system, and ongoing research is described for the Mark III system. The theory is also discussed in the context of other well known multi-attribute systems. The HUI system is an efficient method of determining a general public-based utility score for a specified health outcome or for the health status of an individual. In clinical populations, the scores can be used to provide a single summary measure of health-related quality of life. In cost-utility analyses, the scores can be used as quality weights for calculating quality-adjusted life years. In general populations, the measure can be used as quality weights for determining population health expectancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Apr 15;118(8):622-9 - PubMed
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):593-603 - PubMed
    1. Health Rep. 1992;4(3):313-9 - PubMed
    1. CMAJ. 1993 Mar 15;148(6):921-4 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 22;305(17):982-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources