Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Dec;4(4):240-3.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.240.

Medication errors during hospital drug rounds

Affiliations

Medication errors during hospital drug rounds

K W Ridge et al. Qual Health Care. 1995 Dec.

Abstract

Objective--To determine the nature and rate of drug administration errors in one National Health Service hospital. Design--Covert observational survey be tween January and April 1993 of drug rounds with intervention to stop drug administration errors reaching the patient. Setting--Two medical, two surgical, and two medicine for the elderly wards in a former district general hospital, now a NHS trust hospital. Subjects--37 Nurses performing routine single nurse drug rounds. Main measures--Drug administration errors recorded by trained observers. Results--Seventy four drug rounds were observed in which 115 errors occurred during 3312 drug administrations. The overall error rate was 3.5% (95% confidence interval 2.9% to 4.1%). Errors owing to omissions, because the drug had not been supplied or located or the prescription had not been seen, accounted for most (68%, 78) of the errors. Wrong doses accounted for 15% (17) errors, four of which were greater than the prescribed dose. The dose was given within two hours of the time indicated by the prescriber in 98.2% of cases. Conclusion--The observed rate of drug administration errors is too high. It might be reduced by a multidisciplinary review of practices in prescribing, supply, and administration of drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Lancet. 1965 Feb 13;1(7381):373-8 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1965 Feb 13;1(7381):370-3 - PubMed
    1. Qual Health Care. 1992 Mar;1(1):5-9 - PubMed
    1. J R Soc Med. 1994 Mar;87(3):145-8 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1967 Mar 25;1(7491):668-71 - PubMed

MeSH terms