Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1994 Nov;6(5):442-52.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406050-00006.

Cost of treatment and prevention of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease. An international perspective

Affiliations
Review

Cost of treatment and prevention of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease. An international perspective

D A Clements. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Nov.

Abstract

On the basis of immunogenicity and protective efficacy studies, 4 Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccines have been licensed for administration to infants and children. Population based studies of Hib disease from Australia, Chile, Finland, Gambia, Israel, Switzerland, UK and US show that the relative and absolute incidence of Hib disease varies significantly. These differences in Hib epidemiology, and associated sequelae and hospital costs affect the cost-benefit analysis of preventive vaccination, necessitating unique calculations for each country. Published papers on the cost of Hib disease and the cost-benefit relationship of Hib vaccination have been based primarily on reports from the US, but more recently also on studies from Australia, Finland, Israel, Switzerland, UK, Sweden and Chile. All studies to date have produced favourable cost-benefit ratios. The implementation of Hib vaccination has led to the virtual disappearance of Hib disease in some of these countries. The lessons gained from these analyses are instructive not only for better understanding of the epidemiology of Hib disease, but also as a template for assessing the cost-benefit ratio of the implementation of preventive vaccination for other diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. JAMA. 1993 Jan 13;269(2):221-6 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991 Feb;10(2):113-7 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;165 Suppl 1:S26-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jun 14;310(24):1561-6 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jun 20;324(25):1767-72 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources