Aid coordination for health sector reform: a conceptual framework for analysis and assessment

Abstract

Recent widespread interest in health sector policy and institutional reform in lower income countries has coincided with heightened concern for aid coordination. Because the health budgets of many low income countries are highly aid dependent, donors are strongly placed to make aid conditional on health care reforms. However, given the growing number and heterogeneity of multilateral, bilateral and international non-governmental donors operating in many of these countries, there is concern that if external efforts are not coordinated, the aims of health care reform--namely improving efficiency, effectiveness and equity--will not be met. Evidence is mounting that without effective coordination arrangements, donors may weaken rather than improve fragile health systems, undermining attempts to reform those systems. This paper traces the factors fuelling current interest in coordination, in particular with reference to its contribution to the goals of health sector reform. Aid coordination is defined and its principles elaborated. A framework is developed by which to assess the variety of coordination mechanisms which are evolving at the county level. In light of this framework, a case is made for greater and more critical analysis of aid coordination arrangements. The paper concludes that if health sector reform is to be successful in low income countries, current enthusiasm for coordination needs to be harnessed. The framework offered here provides a way of assessing the variety of coordination mechanisms currently proliferating, which could be used to enhance health sector reform.