Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 May;11(5):464-72.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711050-00008.

Bootstrap analyses of cost effectiveness in antidepressant pharmacotherapy

Affiliations

Bootstrap analyses of cost effectiveness in antidepressant pharmacotherapy

R L Obenchain et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 May.

Abstract

In this study, we describe 'bootstrap' methodology for placing statistical confidence limits around an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). This approach was applied to a retrospective study of annual charges for patients undergoing pharmacotherapy for depression. We used MarketScanSM (service mark) data from 1990 to 1992, which includes medical and pharmacy claims for a privately insured group of employed individuals and their families in the US. Our primary effectiveness measure was the proportion of patients who remained stable on their initial antidepressant medication for at least 6 consecutive months. Our primary cost measure was the total annual charge incurred by patients taking the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine, a tricyclic antidepressant or a heterocyclic antidepressant. On average, fluoxetine pharmacotherapy tended to decrease annual charges by $US16.48 per patient for each percentage increase in depressed patients remaining stable on initial pharmacotherapy for 6 months, resulting in a negative ICER point-estimate. However, the upper ICER confidence limit is positive, which means that fluoxetine treatment may possibly increase annual per patient charges. With 95% confidence, any such increase was no more than $US130 per patient for each percentage increase in patients remaining stable on initial pharmacotherapy for at least 6 months. One advantage of using a bootstrap approach to ICER analysis is that it does not require restrictive distributional assumptions about cost and outcome measures. Bootstrapping also yields a dramatic graphical display of the variability in cost and effectiveness outcomes that result when a study is literally 'redone' hundreds of times. This graphic also displays the ICER confidence interval as a 'wedge-shaped' region on the cost-effectiveness plane. In fact, bootstrapping is easier to explain and appreciate than the elaborate calculations and approximations otherwise involved in ICER estimation. Our discussion addresses key technical questions, such as the role of logarithmic transformation in symmetrising highly skewed cost distributions. We hope that our discussion contributes to a dialogue, leading ultimately to a consensus on analysis of ICERs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Nov;48(11):1420-6 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 1998 Sep 15;17(17):1943-58 - PubMed
    1. Med Decis Making. 1990 Jul-Sep;10(3):212-4 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1995 Jan 4;273(1):51-8 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1994 Feb;32(2):150-63 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources