Cost-effective treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea including co-infection with Chlamydia trachomatis
- PMID: 10170462
- DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199712030-00009
Cost-effective treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea including co-infection with Chlamydia trachomatis
Abstract
We evaluated the cost effectiveness of treating uncomplicated gonorrhoea in a theoretical cohort of 1000 adults (nonpregnant women of reproductive age, or men) with either intramuscular ceftriaxone 125 mg or a single oral dose of cefixime 400 mg, ofloxacin 400 mg or ciprofloxacin 500 mg. We assumed that all patients were also empirically treated for uncomplicated chlamydial infection, with either a single oral dose of azithromycin 1 g, or oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days. Treatment of gonorrhoea with intramuscular ceftriaxone was found to be the most cost-effective alternative. This was followed by treatment with the either of the fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin), then cefixime. For empirical treatment of uncomplicated chlamydial infection, doxycycline was more cost effective than azithromycin when approximately more than 80% of the patients were assumed to comply with the doxycycline regimen. When patients' compliance was poor with the doxycycline regimen, the azithromycin therapy became more cost effective from a societal viewpoint. Nevertheless, its relatively high cost to the individual patient with limited financial resources might prevent him or her from filling prescriptions. Any decrease in patients' compliance with the azithromycin therapy would favour treatment with doxycycline.
Similar articles
-
Azithromycin. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use as a single-dose regimen in the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Nov;12(5):596-611. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712050-00010. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997. PMID: 10174326 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of five different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis.J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995 Jan-Feb;8(1):7-16. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995. PMID: 7701965
-
A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women.Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jan 1;124(1 Pt 1):1-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_1-199601010-00001. Ann Intern Med. 1996. PMID: 7503471
-
Doxycycline compared with azithromycin for treating women with genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis.Ann Intern Med. 1996 Feb 15;124(4):389-99. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-4-199602150-00002. Ann Intern Med. 1996. PMID: 8554247
-
Therapy for gonococcal infections: options in 1989.Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Jul-Aug;12 Suppl 6:S633-44. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.supplement_6.s633. Rev Infect Dis. 1990. PMID: 2117303 Review.
Cited by
-
Azithromycin. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use as a single-dose regimen in the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Nov;12(5):596-611. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712050-00010. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997. PMID: 10174326 Review.
-
Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.Drugs. 2000 Sep;60(3):597-605. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060030-00006. Drugs. 2000. PMID: 11030469
-
Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Jun;82(3):193-200; discussion 201. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.017517. Sex Transm Infect. 2006. PMID: 16731666 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical