Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Fall;19(1):87-103.

A modular case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation illustrated

Affiliations

A modular case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation illustrated

M G Stineman et al. Health Care Financ Rev. 1997 Fall.

Abstract

The authors present a modular set of patient classification systems designed for medical rehabilitation that predict resource use and outcomes for clinically similar groups of individuals. The systems, based on the Functional Independence Measure, are referred to as Function-Related Groups (FIM-FRGs). Using data from 23,637 lower extremity fracture patients from 458 inpatient medical rehabilitation facilities, 1995 benchmarks are provided and illustrated for length of stay, functional outcome, and discharge to home and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The FIM-FRG modules may be used in parallel to study interactions between resource use and quality and could ultimately yield an integrated strategy for payment and outcomes measurement. This could position the rehabilitation community to take a pioneering role in the application of outcomes-based clinical indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Lower-Extremity-Fracture (LEFX) Length-of-Stay Function-Related Groups
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lower-Extremitv-Fracture (LEFX) Discharqe-Motor Functional Independence Measure Function-Related Groups (DMF-FRGs)
Figure 3
Figure 3. 1995 Lower-Extremity-Fracture Length-of-Stay Norms
Figure 4
Figure 4. 1995 Lower-Extremity-Fracture Functional Outcome Benchmarks
Figure 5
Figure 5. A Framework for Monitoring Rehabilitation Postacute Care

References

    1. Breiman L, Freidman J, Olshen R, Stone C. Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth International Group; 1984.
    1. Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Cleary PD. Part 2: Measuring Quality of Care. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996 Sep;335(13):966–970. - PubMed
    1. Carter G, Buchanan J, Donyo T, et al. A Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Rehabilitation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research; Jun, 1997a. PM-683-HCFA. A project memorandum prepared for the Health Care Financing Administration.
    1. Carter G, Relles D, Buchanan J, et al. A Classification System for Inpatient Medical Rehabilitation Patients: A Review and Proposed Revisions to the Functional Independence Measure-Function Related Groups. Santa Monica, CA: RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research; Jun, 1997b. PM-682-HCFA. A project memorandum prepared for the Health Care Financing Administration.
    1. Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. Standards Manual and Interpretive Guidelines for Medical Rehabilitation. Tucson, AZ.: 1997.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources