Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Feb;126(3):697-700.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702366.

Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade on proximal fluid uptake in the rat kidney

Affiliations

Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade on proximal fluid uptake in the rat kidney

M L Smart et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1999 Feb.

Abstract

Angiotensin II has a well described dose-dependent biphasic action on proximal tubule fluid uptake, although the concentration and effect of endogenous luminal angiotensin II remain controversial. Shrinking split-droplet micropuncture was used to examine the fluid uptake in response to the luminal application of three AT1 antagonists (losartan, EXP3174, candesartan). Addition of losartan at 10(-8) M decreased fluid uptake rate (Jva) by 17.5+/-2.2% (P<0.05). Luminal addition of EXP3174 at concentrations between 10(-9)-10(-5) M caused a dose-dependent decrease in fluid uptake, with a maximum decrease of 41.0+/-9.5% (P<0.01) at 10(-6) M. Candesartan also decreased fluid uptake, by 21.9+/-4.9% (P<0.05) at 10(-8) M and 23.6+/-5.5% (P<0.05) at 10(-5) M. All three antagonists at a low concentration (10(-8) M) decreased fluid uptake. EXP3174 and candesartan at a higher concentration (10(-5) M) also decreased fluid uptake in contrast to the previously reported effect of losartan. We conclude that the endogenous concentration of antiotensin II in the proximal luminal fluid is low and exerts a stimulatory effect on fluid absorption. Losartan at concentrations greater than 10(-6) M may have a non-selective action on fluid uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effect of intratubular AT1 antagonists on proximal tubular fluid absorption. Data are shown as means±s.e.mean and presented as percentage changes in fluid absorption compared with control. Figures in parentheses indicate numbers of animals. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (paired t-test).

References

    1. BRAAM B., MITCHELL K.D., FOX J., NAVAR L.G. Proximal tubular secretion of angiotensin II in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 1993;264:F891–F898. - PubMed
    1. BURNIER M., ROCH-RAMAL F., BRUNNER H.R. Renal effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade in normotensive subjects. Kidney Int. 1996;49:1787–1790. - PubMed
    1. CHIU A.T., MCCALL D.E., PRICE W.A., WONG P.C., CARINI D.J., DUNCIA J.V., WEXLER R.R., YOO S.E., JOHNSON A.L., TIMMERMANS P.B.M.W.M. Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists. VII. Cellular and biochemical pharmacology of DUP 753, an orally active antihypertensive agent. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1990;252:711–717. - PubMed
    1. EDWARDS R.M., TRIZNA W., STACK E.J., WEINSTOCK J. Interaction of nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists with the urate transporter in rat renal brush-border membranes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996;276:125–129. - PubMed
    1. HARRIS P.J., CULLINAN M., THOMAS D., MORGAN T.O. Digital image capture and analysis for split-droplet micropuncture. Pflügers Arch. 1987;408:615–618. - PubMed

Publication types