Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Apr;211(1):119-28.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap33119.

Total-body echo-planar MR imaging in the staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional methods--early experience

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Total-body echo-planar MR imaging in the staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional methods--early experience

L J Horvath et al. Radiology. 1999 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To test breast cancer staging with total-body echo-planar magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

Materials and methods: Nineteen patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were imaged by using a 1.5-T echo-planar MR system. By using a table sweep method, 180 contiguous axial images were obtained from the cranial vertex through the feet with T2-weighted spin-echo and inversion-recovery sequences. Results were compared with those of conventional imaging. Therapeutic decisions based on echo-planar MR imaging and conventional imaging results were compared. Diagnostic truth was determined by means of tissue diagnosis, further imaging findings, and follow-up findings (median, 18 months).

Results: Staging with total-body echo-planar MR imaging was correct in 18 patients (95%)--eight with metastases and 10 without--while staging with conventional imaging was correct in 15 patients (79%). In one patient, both echo-planar MR imaging and conventional imaging findings incorrectly indicated probable metastases. In one patient thought to have bone metastases at conventional imaging, echo-planar MR imaging findings were normal, which was correct. Two patients with stage IV disease were not suspected to have disease at conventional imaging: One had liver involvement and the other had skeletal metastases. The therapeutic decisions in these two patients were altered by the echo-planar MR imaging results.

Conclusion: Total-body echo-planar MR imaging was at least as accurate as conventional imaging for staging newly diagnosed breast cancer and was faster, simpler, and completely noninvasive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources