Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 1999 Apr 10;318(7189):984-90.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7189.984.

Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis

R Walton et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To review the effectiveness of computer support for determining optimum drug dose.

Design: Systematic review of comparative studies where computers gave advice to clinicians on the most appropriate drug dose. Search methods used were standard for the Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice.

Subjects: Comparative studies conducted worldwide and published between 1966 and 1996.

Main outcome measures: For qualitative review, relative percentage differences were calculated to compare effects of computer support in different settings. For quantitative data, effect sizes were calculated and combined in meta-analyses.

Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The drugs studied were theophylline, warfarin, heparin, aminoglycosides, nitroprusside, lignocaine, oxytocin, fentanyl, and midazolam. The computer programs used individualised pharmacokinetic models to calculate the most appropriate dose. Meta-analysis of data from 671 patients showed higher blood concentrations of drug with computer support (effect size 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 1.02) and reduced time to achieve therapeutic control (0.44, 0.17 to 0.71). The total dose of drug used was unchanged, and there were fewer unwanted effects of treatment. Five of six studies measuring outcomes of care showed benefit from computer assistance.

Conclusions: This review suggests that using computers to determine the correct dose of certain drugs in acute hospital settings is beneficial. Computers may give doctors the confidence to use higher doses when necessary, adjusting the drug dose more accurately to individual patients. Further research is necessary to evaluate the benefits in general use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Quantitative effects of computer support for determining drug dose on outcomes of care (standardised weighted mean differences (95% confidence intervals) for computer support versus control)

References

    1. McDonald CJ. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectibility of man. N Engl J Med. 1976;295:1351–1355. - PubMed
    1. Baldwin L. Calculating drug doses. BMJ. 1995;310:1154. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rolfe S, Harper NJN. Ability of hospital doctors to calculate drug doses. BMJ. 1995;310:1173–1174. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice. The Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice data collection checklist. York: Department of Health Sciences and Clinical Evaluation, University of York; 1996.
    1. Bero L, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Oxman A Cochrane Collaboration, editors. The Cochrane Library. Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software; 1997. The Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice (CCEPP) module of the Cochrane database of systematic reviews [updated 03 June 1997]

MeSH terms