Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation
- PMID: 10201747
- DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199904000-00014
Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation
Abstract
Objective: To assess the influence of age at implantation on speech perception and speech intelligibility following pediatric cochlear implantation.
Study design: A prospective study was undertaken on a consecutive group of 126 congenital and prelingually deaf children up to 4 years after implantation. The study group was confined to prelingually deaf children less than 7 years of age at the time of implantation. All had implantation with the same multichannel cochlear implant system. No child was lost to follow-up, and there were no exclusions from the study.
Methods: The Iowa Matrix Closed Set Sentence test, connected discourse tracking, categories of auditory performance, and speech intelligibility rating were used to assess the speech perception (closed and open set) and speech intelligibility of the children with implants. Regression analysis and Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between the outcome measures with age at implantation. The setting was a tertiary referral pediatric cochlear implant center in the United Kingdom.
Results: Age at implantation positively correlated with preimplantation assessment performance and with most of the outcome measures up to 24 months following implantation. However, at the 3-and 4-year intervals following implantation, age at implantation was found to be a strong negative predictor of all the outcomes studied (correlation coefficients ranging from -0.44 to -0.58, all statistically significant [P<.05]).
Conclusions: The results of the present study provide strong evidence that prelingually deaf children should receive implants as early as possible to facilitate the later development of speech perception skills and speech intelligibility and thus maximize the health gain from the intervention. However, because of the wide variation in individual outcomes, age alone should not be used as a criterion to decide implant candidacy.
Similar articles
-
Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation.Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):762-7. Am J Otol. 1998. PMID: 9831151
-
Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation.Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):742-6. Am J Otol. 1998. PMID: 9831147
-
Impact of early cochlear implantation on the linguistic development of the deaf child.Otol Neurotol. 2009 Sep;30(6):736-42. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b2367b. Otol Neurotol. 2009. PMID: 19638938
-
Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation.Dev Psychobiol. 2005 Apr;46(3):252-61. doi: 10.1002/dev.20052. Dev Psychobiol. 2005. PMID: 15772969 Review.
-
Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.Laryngoscope. 2005 Jan;115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200501001-00001. Laryngoscope. 2005. PMID: 15626926 Review.
Cited by
-
Audiological and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformation Compared to the Normal Inner Ear.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1870-1875. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03760-y. Epub 2023 Apr 19. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 37636621 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative evaluation, surgical procedure, follow up and results of 150 cochlear implantations.Hippokratia. 2007 Apr;11(2):77-82. Hippokratia. 2007. PMID: 19582182 Free PMC article.
-
Commentary: "Compensatory plasticity: time matters".Front Neurosci. 2015 Oct 8;9:348. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00348. eCollection 2015. Front Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26500477 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Some measures of verbal and spatial working memory in eight- and nine-year-old hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.Ear Hear. 2001 Oct;22(5):395-411. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200110000-00004. Ear Hear. 2001. PMID: 11605947 Free PMC article.
-
Mutation screening in non-syndromic hearing loss patients with cochlear implantation by massive parallel sequencing in Taiwan.PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211261. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30682115 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical