Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs
- PMID: 10202472
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600397
Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the effect of noise on the compressibility and the diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
Methods: Bitewing radiographs of patients were obtained with a storage phosphor (Digora, Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) and compressed at different JPEG compression levels (2, 27, 53 and 128). A just noticeable difference study was performed to select a compression level to study the added noise effect. Gaussian noise was added at low, medium, and high levels to both the original and compressed images. Seven observers examined the selected approximal surfaces to identify the caries depth. ROC analysis was performed together with ANOVA at P = 0.05.
Results: The compressibility of the images decreased as the noise level increased. ROC analysis revealed no significant difference between the original and compressed images within the same noise level (P > 0.06). With added noise compressed/decompressed images had a higher Az than the corresponding original images.
Conclusions: JPEG compression at level 27 can be used without a significant deterioration in diagnostic accuracy. Compression at this level seemed to reduce the effect of noise to some extent.
Similar articles
-
Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Jan;29(1):20-7. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600488. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000. PMID: 10654032
-
A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 Jul;31(4):257-63. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600704. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002. PMID: 12087443
-
Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 May;28(3):182-5. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600438. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999. PMID: 10740474
-
Digital radiography and caries diagnosis.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 Jan;27(1):3-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600321. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998. PMID: 9482015 Review.
-
Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions.J Dent Res. 2004;83 Spec No C:C72-5. doi: 10.1177/154405910408301s14. J Dent Res. 2004. PMID: 15286126 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of five levels of noise reduction applied to indirect digital radiography on diagnostic accuracy of external apical root resorption.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Mar 17;17(2):126-133. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020. PMID: 32435435 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the digital file format on radiographic diagnostic in dentistry: a scoping review.Braz Oral Res. 2024 Sep 30;38:e100. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0100. eCollection 2024. Braz Oral Res. 2024. PMID: 39356906 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):102-9. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/86968802. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21239573 Free PMC article.
-
Computed Tomography Image Compressibility and Limitations of Compression Ratio-Based Guidelines.J Digit Imaging. 2015 Dec;28(6):636-45. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9791-7. J Digit Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25804842 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical