The after breakfast 50-g, 1-hour glucose challenge test in urban Mexican pregnant women: its sensitivity and specificity evaluated by three diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus
- PMID: 10203295
The after breakfast 50-g, 1-hour glucose challenge test in urban Mexican pregnant women: its sensitivity and specificity evaluated by three diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Background: To study the sensitivity and specificity of the 50-g, 1-hour gestational glucose challenge test performed 1 to 2 hours after a non-standardized home breakfast in urban Mexican women by using three different gestational diabetes mellitus diagnostic criteria.
Methods: Four hundred and forty-five consecutive women of 24-28 weeks gestation were studied. The glucose challenge test was performed in the fed state and a week later a fasting 100-g, 3-hours oral glucose tolerance test was carried out in all of them. Duplicate serum glucose concentrations were determined by a glucose-oxidase method. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using three different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus.
Results: The glucose challenge test performed as indicated, with a cutoff of 7.8 mmol/L, had 88-89% sensitivity and 85-87% specificity when using as diagnostic criteria those proposed by the National Diabetes Data Group and by Carpenter & Coustan; by using Sacks et al. criteria, the values were 82% and 88%, respectively. Considering only pregnant women > or = 25 years of age, the sensitivity increased to 92% with the National Diabetes Data Group criteria. Pregnant women < 25 years of age had significantly lower blood glucose values than those with age > or = 25 years during the glucose tolerance test.
Conclusions: For the general group the sensitivity of the glucose challenge test performed 1 to 2 hours after breakfast was similar, based on the National Diabetes Data Group and the Carpenter & Coustan's diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. However, when pregnant women > or = 25 years of age were considered, the use of the former criteria yielded a slightly better sensitivity.
Similar articles
-
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant females.Saudi Med J. 2000 Feb;21(2):155-60. Saudi Med J. 2000. PMID: 11533772
-
Glucose screening in Mexican-American women.Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1241-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124781.98059.fe. Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15172859
-
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Nigerian pregnant women using fifty-gram oral glucose challenge test.West Afr J Med. 2008 Jul;27(3):139-43. West Afr J Med. 2008. PMID: 19256316
-
[The diagnosis of gestational diabetes].Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 1998 Jul-Dec;102(3-4):41-8. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 1998. PMID: 10756842 Review. Romanian.
-
Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes.Isr J Med Sci. 1991 Aug-Sep;27(8-9):503-9. Isr J Med Sci. 1991. PMID: 1960048 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of ROC curves in clinical and experimental studies.J Vasc Bras. 2020 Dec 11;19:e20200186. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.200186. J Vasc Bras. 2020. PMID: 34211533 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Low Glycemic Index Carbohydrates versus All Types of Carbohydrates for Treating Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Glycemic Control.Int J Endocrinol. 2012;2012:296017. doi: 10.1155/2012/296017. Epub 2012 Nov 29. Int J Endocrinol. 2012. PMID: 23251152 Free PMC article.
-
Screening and management of gestational diabetes in Mexico: results from a survey of multilocation, multi-health care institution practitioners.Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2018 Apr 5;11:105-116. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S160658. eCollection 2018. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2018. PMID: 29670384 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources