Treatment of lower ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or intracorporeal lithotripsy?

Abstract

Objective: In this study, 1121 patients with lower ureteral stones were evaluated to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy with three different lithotripsy modalities.

Methods: Of these patients, 726 were treated with SWL, whereas 430 underwent ureteroscopy, with pneumatic lithotripsy (PL), ultrasonic lithotripsy (USL), and electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) performed in 125 (29.0%), 276 (64.2%), and 29 (6.8%) patients, respectively. Thirty-five patients underwent both types of treatment because of unsuccessful SWL therapy.

Results: In the SWL group, the stone-free rate was 42.2% and the fragmentation rate was 59.5%. These values were 96.8% and 98.4% for PL, 89.4% and 90.5% for USL, 93.1% and 96.5% for EHL, respectively.

Conclusions: These data show that SWL was less effective than ureteroscopic lithotripsy (p < 0.001). The PL modality had the highest stone-free and fragmentation rate, and EHL had the highest complication rate (43.5%). Ureteroscopic lithotripsy is the most effective treatment choice in lower ureteral stones no matter which kind of energy is used, and PL is the most effective and least morbid approach.