Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 May;43(5):1118-23.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.5.1118.

Pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model

Affiliations

Pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model

P D Lister et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 May.

Abstract

An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate the pharmacokinetics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin in human serum and to compare their pharmacodynamics against eight Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. The MICs of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin ranged from 1 to 2 micrograms/ml. Trovafloxacin was 8- to 32-fold more potent, with MICs of 0.06 to 0.12 microgram/ml. Logarithmic-phase cultures were exposed to peak concentrations of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin achieved in human serum after 200-, 400-, and 750-mg oral doses, respectively. Trovafloxacin was dosed at 0 and 24 h, and ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were dosed at 0, 12, and 24 h. Human elimination pharmacokinetics were simulated, and viable bacterial counts were measured at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 36 h. Trovafloxacin was rapidly and significantly bactericidal against all eight strains evaluated, with viable bacterial counts decreasing at least 5 logs to undetectable levels. Times to 99.9% killing were only 1 to 3 h. Although the rate of killing with ofloxacin was substantially slower than that with trovafloxacin, ofloxacin was also able to eradicate all eight strains from the model, despite a simulated area under the inhibitory curve/MIC ratio (AUC/MIC) of only 49. In contrast, ciprofloxacin eradicated only five strains (AUC/MIC = 44) from the model. Against the other three strains (AUC/MIC = 22), the antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin was substantially diminished. These data corroborate clinical data and suggest that trovafloxacin has a pharmacodynamic advantage over ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against S. pneumoniae in relation to its enhanced antipneumococcal activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Pharmacokinetics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin in the peripheral compartment of the IVPM after dosing into the central reservoir. Drug levels were measured by bioassay. Each datum point represents the mean drug level in the peripheral compartment (in micrograms per milliliter) for three experimental runs. Error bars show SDs.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Time-kill pharmacodynamics of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against representative strains of S. pneumoniae, 3935 (A), 213 (B), and 256 (C). Each datum point represents the mean CFU per milliliter of THY from the peripheral compartment for duplicate experiments. Error bars show SDs.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Time-kill pharmacodynamics of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against representative strains of S. pneumoniae, 3935 (A), 213 (B), and 256 (C). Each datum point represents the mean CFU per milliliter of THY from the peripheral compartment for duplicate experiments. Error bars show SDs.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Time-kill pharmacodynamics of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against representative strains of S. pneumoniae, 3935 (A), 213 (B), and 256 (C). Each datum point represents the mean CFU per milliliter of THY from the peripheral compartment for duplicate experiments. Error bars show SDs.

References

    1. Barza M, Vine H, Weinstein L. Reversibility of protein binding of penicillins: an in vitro study employing a rapid diafiltration process. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972;1:427–432. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blaser J, Dudley M N, Gilbert D, Zinner S H. Influence of medium and method on the in vitro susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other bacteria to ciprofloxacin and enoxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986;29:927–929. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blaser J, Stone B B, Zinner S H. Two compartment kinetic model with multiple artificial capillary units. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985;15(A):131–137. - PubMed
    1. Chantot J F, Bryskier A. Antibacterial activity of ofloxacin and other 4-quinolone derivatives: in vitro and in vivo comparison. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985;16:475–484. - PubMed
    1. Child J, Andrews J, Boswell F, Brenwald N, Wise R. The in-vitro activity of CP 99,219, a new naphthyridone antimicrobial agent: a comparison with other fluoroquinolone agents. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;35:869–876. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources